Teams

Refunds/Team Pending 55s USTA Adult

2026 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · HOLDING

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesToby Curtis vs David Sutton3-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Chapman/Fleihan 18s 4.5M Mon PMLost 01
L#1 SinglesToby Curtis vs Brandon Dauler4-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs Chapman/Fleihan 18s 4.5M Mon PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesChuck Burns / Toby Curtis vs Philip Kuntz / Bryan Vescio6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesToby Curtis vs Cameron Smith4-6, 1-6
2026-03-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesToby Curtis vs John Hankinson3-6, 3-6
2026-03-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesToby Curtis / Scott Dean vs Caleb Dawson / Marcus Simon6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · HOLDING
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Refunds/Team Pending 18s USTA Adult000000
2Refunds/Team Pending 55s USTA Adult000000
3Refunds/Team Pending 40s USTA Adult000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Toby Curtis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Brandi Jacques
published 3.5
2.99
Anne Benda
published 3
2.77
Kenneth Baum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.57
Simara Levi
published
2.57
Andrea Bushnell
published 3
Melissa Rainey
published
Sherri Nichols Hill
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Toby Curtis
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.66
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
4W–17L career · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Brandi Jacques
19W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Anne Benda
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Kenneth Baum
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.77
Simara Levi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Andrea Bushnell
1W–39L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Melissa Rainey
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sherri Nichols Hill
0W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.