Teams

Rock Creek-Connolly

2022 · 23 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 23 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Darla Light
published 4
3.66
Celia Kramer
published 3.5
3.63
Misty Harrison
published
3.59
Linda Carpentier
published
3.57
Phyllis Case
published
3.56
Nancy Fogg
published
3.24
Harriet Connolly
published 3.5
Kathy Kessler
published
Kim Everhart
published
Kimberly McKenzie
published
Tyra Mason
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darla Light + Harriet Connolly3257% games+9.4% vs expected
Linda Carpentier + Phyllis Case4252% games+7.5% vs expected
Darla Light + Kathy Kessler3351% gamesnot enough data
Darla Light + Nancy Fogg404 matchesnot enough data
Harriet Connolly + Nancy Fogg033 matchesnot enough data
Harriet Connolly + Kimberly McKenzie213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Carpentier + Nancy Fogg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darla Light
48W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
3.5
Celia Kramer
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.66
Misty Harrison
45W–36L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Linda Carpentier
22W–33L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Phyllis Case
44W–33L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Nancy Fogg
53W–50L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Harriet Connolly
40W–69L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Kathy Kessler
19W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Everhart
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly McKenzie
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyra Mason
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.