Teams

Cottonwood Club-Annunziata

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-04vs Sports Mall-WoodSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJamuna Nielsen / Brittany Pope vs Lindsay Lafeen / Michelle Staley2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichelle Cutler / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Chelsea Wood / Miche Ferrin7-5, 6-4
2026-07-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Christine Gouff / Cari Cardall4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-21vs Liberty Park-Lombardi/WebsterLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Cutler / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Jeanette Shepard / Robin Simmons4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennie Bethers / Jane Woolley vs Kelly Webster / Bessy Nielson6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJamuna Nielsen / Brittany Pope vs Malisa Bowen / Brenda Green7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-14vs Park City MARC-AlexanderLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennie Bethers / Mikelle Moore vs Megan Alexander / Tricia Colbert3-6, 2-6
2026-07-07vs Heber Valley Hot ShotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJamuna Nielsen / Brittany Pope vs Jessica Studdert / Jocelyn Bennion2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennie Bethers / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Jennifer Davies / Jennifer Stone4-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs Ivory Ridge Smash SistersLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Jenn Burgon / Sara Madsen1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJamuna Nielsen vs Yolanda Morris4-6, 1-6
2026-06-23vs Ace LadiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Angelyn Sorenson / Mary HENSLEY7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennie Bethers vs Camillia Groberg6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrittany Pope / Jamuna Nielsen vs Kyra Dunshee / Glenna Frey6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-16vs Sports Mall-WoodWon 21
L#1 SinglesJamuna Nielsen vs Jennifer Evans4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Diaz Gordon / Jennie Bethers vs Rachel Stohlton / Lisa Packer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Cami Shipp / Melanie Olsen6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jenna Nicholson
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Janice Stokes-Burns
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Mary Diaz Gordon
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jane Woolley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Lauren Annunziata
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Cutler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Jennie Bethers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Kumru Uruk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Carolyn Cottle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Jamuna Nielsen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Mindi Paskins
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Liesl Lambert
published
2.84
Melissa Child
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.83
Brittany Pope
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.69
Mikelle Moore
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamuna Nielsen + Mary Diaz Gordon10360% games+12.4% vs expected
Mary Diaz Gordon + Jane Woolley6260% games+6.0% vs expected
Mindi Paskins + Janice Stokes-Burns5360% games+4.0% vs expected
Jamuna Nielsen + Melissa Child3449% games+3.8% vs expected
Michelle Cutler + Jennie Bethers7256% games+2.9% vs expected
Michelle Cutler + Carolyn Cottle4355% games+2.5% vs expected
Mikelle Moore + Melissa Child13952% games+2.4% vs expected
Mindi Paskins + Mary Diaz Gordon2357% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jenna Nicholson
8W–4L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Janice Stokes-Burns
132W–134L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Mary Diaz Gordon
108W–65L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Jane Woolley
77W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Lauren Annunziata
136W–138L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Michelle Cutler
149W–101L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jennie Bethers
125W–120L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Kumru Uruk
49W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Jamuna Nielsen
127W–120L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Mindi Paskins
238W–179L career · 7 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Liesl Lambert
17W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Melissa Child
73W–74L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Brittany Pope
36W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Mikelle Moore
46W–52L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.