← Teams

SHC-Dramov/Heath

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Michele O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.67
Catherine Crosby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.46
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Teresa Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Gwen Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results12 ties
2019-07-13Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Crosby / Cynthia Perelli-Minetti vs Amy Jean / Marie Picard7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hill / Nancy Korenek-Leveque vs Kathryn Smith / Lynn Sosa6-4, 6-3
2019-07-12Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Launi Smith / Kori Montpas6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeannine del Bene / Michele O'Brien vs Allison Reid / Leslie OBrien6-1, 6-0
2019-04-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTeresa Jackson / Anita Havemann vs Carrie Fisher / Rochelle Hart6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichele O'Brien vs Aracelia Hettle6-2, 6-0
2019-03-31Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJeannine del Bene / Gwen Matthews vs Lisa Lyon / Mary Ann Seeger7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Crosby / Nancy Korenek-Leveque vs Char Riley / Cathy Porter7-6, 7-5
2019-03-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTeresa Jackson / Anita Havemann vs Darci Keljo / Geraldine Carter6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMichele O'Brien vs Sally Sterling6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCathie Recker / Catherine Crosby vs Linda Lovett / Reidun Zander7-6, 6-4
2019-03-23Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTeresa Jackson / Anita Havemann vs Boon Yon Joung / Seungja Shin6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCatherine Crosby vs Anne Brandenburger6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2019-03-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Angelina Warriner / Nenette Olson6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichele O'Brien vs Severine Michot6-1, 6-3
2019-02-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Boon Yon Joung / Suk Ki Lee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele O'Brien / Nancy Korenek-Leveque vs Flor Harrigan / Julie Hansen6-3, 6-3
2019-02-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCynthia Perelli-Minetti / Catherine Crosby vs Marie Reykalin / Elizabeth Lilly6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGwen Matthews / Jeannine del Bene vs June Kim / Amanda Lowthian6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichele O'Brien vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-01-13Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAnita Havemann / Teresa Jackson vs Mary Chennault / Cindy Rushall6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichele O'Brien / Gwen Matthews vs Jennifer Andrieu / Nikki Nadig6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2018-12-02Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesNancy Korenek-Leveque / Kathy Schaub vs Marje Ferek / Barbara Seatter6-3, 6-4
2018-12-01Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Korenek-Leveque / Brooke Thompson vs Pam Freier / Gail Obra6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Michele O'Brien
101W–43L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Catherine Crosby
67W–26L career
7%93%0%
3.67
3.5
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
76W–81L career · type A
0%89%11%
3.46
4
Teresa Jackson
24W–39L career
60%40%0%
3.40
0
Gwen Matthews
22W–24L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.