Teams

Skeen (ARSC) 2.5W Fall Singles Tues Pm

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 2.5 Women Fall Singles

5 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 SinglesKim Burgess vs Annette Bagnoli6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKari Faulkner vs Jenna Bialik-Speight0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMikayla Gilbert vs Allison Chisholm2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHelen Skeen vs Kaitlin Singh5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Breedlove vs Kimberly Bly0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMikayla Gilbert vs Allison Winters1-6, 2-6
2025-10-07vs Watts 2.5W Fall SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesKim Burgess vs Tia Opyd6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLauren Breedlove vs Jenifer Checo0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHelen Skeen vs Allyson Wood3-6, 1-6
2025-09-30vs Hanger 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesKim Burgess vs Heather Barber6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKari Faulkner vs Caroline Jackson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLauren Breedlove vs Cassandra Thompson0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMikayla Gilbert vs Allison Chisholm2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Breedlove vs Allison Sharpe5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMikayla Gilbert vs Mary Catherine Hartley3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHelen Skeen vs Kimberly Bly6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKari Faulkner vs Allison Winters1-6, 1-6
2025-09-02vs Watts 2.5W Fall SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKim Burgess vs Erica Harden6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKari Faulkner vs Katlyn Staub3-6, 0-6
2025-08-26vs Hanger 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesHelen Skeen vs Cassandra Thompson2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMikayla Gilbert vs Carrie Hanger7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLauren Breedlove vs Heather Barber0-6, 0-6
2025-08-19vs Barnes 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesKim Burgess vs Meredith Lantz1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesHelen Skeen vs Susan Barnes3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKari Faulkner vs Lyndsey Grubb6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Kim Burgess
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.70
Lauren Breedlove
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Helen Skeen
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Kari Faulkner
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Mikayla Gilbert
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Burgess
13W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.57
Lauren Breedlove
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.70
Helen Skeen
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kari Faulkner
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mikayla Gilbert
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.