Teams

2026 Adult 65 & Over 6.0W Holley - HP

2026 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 6.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Mary Mihaly
published
2.85
2.85
JT Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Jodi Holley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Betsy Murphy
published 3
2.75
Diana Filliman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
2.71
Kathy Clapp
published
2.69
Catherine Porto
published 3
2.62
Donna Brennan
published 3
2.61
Kristi Bowen
published
2.57
2.52
Rena Highland
published
Jan Harper
published
Patti Alcaraz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rena Highland + Kristi Bowen5454% games+6.6% vs expected
Jodi Holley + Diana Filliman7259% games+2.0% vs expected
Jodi Holley + Celeste Guillebaud191651% games+1.6% vs expected
Rena Highland + Crystal Wagner-McCombs9949% games+1.1% vs expected
Mary Mihaly + Diana Filliman13950% games−3.5% vs expected
Diana Filliman + JT Schneider11951% games−4.5% vs expected
Jan Harper + Celeste Guillebaud51743% games−7.7% vs expected
Jodi Holley + Patti Alcaraz13459% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Mihaly
78W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Celeste Guillebaud
52W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
JT Schneider
34W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jodi Holley
136W–130L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Betsy Murphy
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Diana Filliman
123W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Crystal Wagner-McCombs
54W–74L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Kathy Clapp
34W–37L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Catherine Porto
48W–65L career · no lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Donna Brennan
54W–56L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
Kristi Bowen
46W–52L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Elizabeth Kerkmans
29W–53L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Rena Highland
56W–63L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Jan Harper
17W–54L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patti Alcaraz
25W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.