Teams

LCTA75/Geller/PF

75 & Over · 75 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-11vs MCTA75/Alford/USCLWon 21
W#1 DoublesPete Lebhar / Robert Armstrong vs Richard Porter / Glen Wensley6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBill Womble / Leon Geller vs Cary Grant / Jim Alford6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGary Phoebus / David Stemerman vs Jim Bolig / Boris Sylvia1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKenneth Dauses / Jack Buchanan vs Stephen Henry / Randel Cooper1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLeon Geller / Bill Womble vs Mark Peterman / David Barrett6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGary Phoebus / David Stemerman vs Kenneth Uhlig / Larry Berridge7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 75 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
David Stemerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Leon Geller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Pete Lebhar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kenneth Dauses
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bill Womble
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Gary Phoebus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Frank Grubb
published
Jack Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leon Geller + Pete Lebhar6361% games−2.6% vs expected
Jack Buchanan + Leon Geller404 matchesnot enough data
Jack Buchanan + Frank Grubb314 matchesnot enough data
Jack Buchanan + Kenneth Dauses224 matchesnot enough data
Leon Geller + Frank Grubb404 matchesnot enough data
Leon Geller + Kenneth Dauses314 matchesnot enough data
Pete Lebhar + Kenneth Dauses314 matchesnot enough data
Jack Buchanan + Pete Lebhar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Stemerman
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Leon Geller
66W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Pete Lebhar
54W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Kenneth Dauses
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Bill Womble
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Phoebus
27W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Frank Grubb
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Jack Buchanan
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.