Teams

DeKalb Tennis Center (Patti Hinkle)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 55 & Over Women · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesKim Brown / Denise Koo vs Stephanie Barnard / Sandra Jewell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Kocher / Stephanie Ricker vs Kristin Doherty / Anne Horne3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Hinkle / Kris Fulk vs Meg Peaden / Diane Mathews6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-11-03vs South Fulton (Susan Dickey)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRuth Parker / Amy Smith vs Susan Dickey / Katherine Wood6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Brown / Debra Kocher vs Micki Harris / Roxanne Balboa6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Ricker / Karen Ruszkowski vs Barbara Barnard / Wendy Boone6-7, 3-6
2025-10-22vs USTA Atlanta/Vickie WareLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Brown / Debra Kocher vs Joy Cliche / Kimmie Wise7-5, 4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGigi Conner / Kris Fulk vs Debbi Seelye / Jennifer Trevena0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Hinkle / Stephanie Ricker vs Janelle Bohan / Christy Sheahan3-6, 6-3, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKim Brown / Denise Koo vs Stephanie Barnard / Kristy Rosenberg6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Kishbaugh / Stephanie Ricker vs Rosemary Alexander / Margaret Staats3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGigi Conner / Patti Hinkle vs Allison Kelly / Judy Bloom3-6, 2-6
2025-10-08vs South Fulton (Cindy Robertson)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesKim Brown / Denise Koo vs Carol Kuehn / Amy Egoroff6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeverly Blissit / Karen Ruszkowski vs Cindy Robertson / Laura Quandt3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatti Hinkle / Debra Kocher vs Connie Borovsky / Paula Goodman6-2, 6-0
2025-10-01vs Rockdale TC (Nancy Newman)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Brown / Ruth Parker vs Kathy Elliott / Martha Wilson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Kocher / Stephanie Ricker vs Kim Shambo / MaryAnna Vaughan3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKris Fulk / Karen Ruszkowski vs Julia Cates / Nancy Newman3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hedgerows (Karen Bart)*6014410134
2USTA Atlanta/Vickie Ware6014410125
3Saddle Creek (Paula Hope)*5110819184
4USTA Atlanta/Robin Wilkinson4214411141
5Lost Mountain TC (Mary Kang)*2461226214
6DeKalb Tennis Center (Patti Hinkle)*1561227205
7Bridgemill (Sandra Woodard)*0641429219
8EE Robinson Park (Tricia Morgan)*0621632217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Ruth Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Denise Koo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Beverly Blissit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Karen Ruszkowski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Debra Kocher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Patti Hinkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Janet Kishbaugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Gigi Conner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Stephanie Ricker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Kris Fulk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Balser
published
Kim Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Brown + Debra Kocher3648% games+14.2% vs expected
Beverly Blissit + Karen Ruszkowski9162% games+8.8% vs expected
Patti Hinkle + Beverly Blissit4354% games+0.1% vs expected
Stephanie Ricker + Janet Kishbaugh4749% games−0.6% vs expected
Patti Hinkle + Stephanie Ricker2646% games−0.9% vs expected
Stephanie Ricker + Debra Kocher1541% games−6.3% vs expected
Patti Hinkle + Janet Kishbaugh2348% gamesnot enough data
Gigi Conner + Jennifer Balser3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Parker
24W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Denise Koo
24W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Beverly Blissit
40W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Karen Ruszkowski
25W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Debra Kocher
30W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Patti Hinkle
34W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Janet Kishbaugh
18W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Gigi Conner
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Stephanie Ricker
23W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.53
Kris Fulk
5W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
Jennifer Balser
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Brown
20W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.