Teams

horowitz - BCC Aces

2025 Montgomery Doubles Fall Women · Montgomery Doubles Fall 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-08vs Bell - Love AllWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Kaeli Duggan vs Tracy Brandt / Corlyn Krinsky6-3, 6-3
2025-12-01vs Block Copeland - Aspen HillWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Sherry Altman vs Victoria Copeland / Sherry Dunda7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-10vs Maggin - Lakewood CCLost 12
W#1 DoublesBridget Foist / Elizabeth Hunter vs Christine Koy / Laurie Stien7-5, 3-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kress / E Molly Hemsley vs Cheryl Hays / Christina Mendelson0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Herson / Tannaz Poursaeid vs Jenna Harar / Carrie Rost0-6, 2-6
2025-10-29vs Birchfield - Smart Aces 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKathi Teitelbaum / Monica Brenneman vs Robin Birchfield / Kristin Satterfield6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Fall 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kathryn L Boothe
published
3.79
Sherry Altman
published
3.77
Elizabeth Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bridget Foist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Kathi Teitelbaum
published
3.61
Kirsten Propst
published
3.58
Katharine Marino
published
3.54
Kim Rehmann
published
3.31
Patricia Rose
published
3.29
Monica Brenneman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
E Molly Hemsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Sandy Horowitz
published
Jennifer Kress
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kaeli Duggan
published
Kay Han
published
Melanie Wine
published
Susie Barnello
published
Tannaz Poursaeid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vicki Herson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn L Boothe
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Sherry Altman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Hunter
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bridget Foist
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathi Teitelbaum
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Kirsten Propst
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.61
Katharine Marino
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kim Rehmann
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Patricia Rose
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Monica Brenneman
46W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
E Molly Hemsley
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Jennifer Kress
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kaeli Duggan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kay Han
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Wine
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susie Barnello
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tannaz Poursaeid
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Herson
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.