Teams

MTC - Cabral

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Mobile · 18 & Over 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-24vs MTC - HuettemannLost 12
W#1 DoublesWes Steiner / Joey Campbell vs Reggie Oyler / Manning Courtney6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCasey Rodden / Chao Wang vs Eric Brechtel / Darren Barrett0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFarzam Bayat / Odie van Devender vs Mark LaRose / Cody Reilmann2-6, 3-6
2026-03-17vs MTC - Wruck/NguyenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoey Campbell / Ron Cassity vs Reshad Bell / Robert Willett6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCasey Rodden / Aaron Stricklin vs Douglas Wruck / Christopher Robinson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Samaj / Farzam Bayat vs Bryan Cooper / Tyler Warren7-6, 7-6
2026-03-03vs MTC - HuettemannLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoey Campbell / Ron Cassity vs Chris Bonham / John McAnnally6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesReeve Cabral / Chao Wang vs John Meacham / Sam Wilson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesOdie van Devender / Peter Samaj vs Evan Wojtala / Cody Reilmann4-6, 2-6
2026-02-24vs MTC - Wruck/NguyenLost 03
L#1 DoublesWes Steiner / Ron Cassity vs Brendan Charles / TImothy McSpadden3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Stricklin / Chao Wang vs Douglas Wruck / Edward Powers3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesFarzam Bayat / Odie van Devender vs Caleb Lyght / Tyler Warren4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTC - Huettemann317511101
2MTC - Wruck/Nguyen226614111
3MTC - Cabral135715119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Wes Steiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Ron Cassity
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Aaron Stricklin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Casey Rodden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Reeve Cabral
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Odie van Devender
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Peter Samaj
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Farzam Bayat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Samaj + Farzam Bayat3253% gamesnot enough data
Odie van Devender + Farzam Bayat033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wes Steiner
41W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Ron Cassity
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Aaron Stricklin
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Casey Rodden
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
Reeve Cabral
17W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Odie van Devender
63W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
Peter Samaj
32W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Farzam Bayat
18W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.