Teams

The Westwood Boys

2022 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-15Won 10
W#3 SinglesYancey Jones vs Chris Barlowe6-2, 6-1
2022-08-03vs Salisbury SpillerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJackson Dyer vs Brian Wright6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesYancey Jones vs EJ Watkins6-3, 6-2
2022-07-13Won 20
W#2 SinglesJackson Dyer vs Brett Mortensen6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesYancey Jones vs Brian Swecker6-1, 6-0
2022-07-11vs Woodlake ElliottWon 10
W#3 SinglesJackson Dyer vs Doug Garrett6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Matthew Boys
published
3.90
Yancey Jones
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jackson Dyer
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.68
Sean DiBlasi
published
3.29
Mark Wickersham
published
Travis Bohn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackson Dyer + Yancey Jones361064% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Boys
24W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Yancey Jones
89W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jackson Dyer
141W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Sean DiBlasi
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Mark Wickersham
13W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Travis Bohn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.