Teams

Huffhines/Ethington W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-07vs Chandlers Landing/Oelke-Lee W4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Sipes / Cindy Taylor vs Carla Brooks / Misty Carlyle6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSundee McDonald / Cristin Pike vs Kathie Norris / Leona Halama6-2, 6-4
2025-02-28vs DCC/Heartfield W4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesDoreen Thomas / Sandy Seaton vs Susan Thompson / Cynthia Beecherl4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Morefield / Suzanne Kim vs Christine Danuser / Jennifer Coats2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSundee McDonald / Lynelle Reynolds vs Cassandra Johnson / Meredith Turner6-1, 6-3
2025-02-14vs DAC/E.Bein-Jolly W4.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesJill Nail / Lynelle Reynolds vs Kelly Musgrave / Whitney Ragsdale3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMary Alyce Kaetzel vs Ryan Conner6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Sipes / Aimee Cali vs Donna Lee / Yvette Freeman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoulia Prous / Laura Smith vs Trina Rust-Brimelow / Lauren Becker7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Valerie van Ausdall
published
Cindy Taylor
published 4
3.74
Jill Nail
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Sandy Seaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Sundee McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Shannon Craig
published
3.60
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.58
Aimee Cali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Doreen Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Melissa Sipes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Joulia Prous
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Cristin Pike
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Linsey Ethington
published
3.42
Suzanne Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Amber Morefield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Jennifer Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynelle Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Holiner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Dugan + Sundee McDonald3355% games+9.9% vs expected
Mary Alyce Kaetzel + Sundee McDonald5446% games−6.3% vs expected
Cristin Pike + Mary Alyce Kaetzel2348% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Seaton + Doreen Thomas134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valerie van Ausdall
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Cindy Taylor
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Nail
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Sandy Seaton
9W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Sundee McDonald
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Shannon Craig
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Aimee Cali
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Doreen Thomas
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Melissa Sipes
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Joulia Prous
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Cristin Pike
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Linsey Ethington
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Suzanne Kim
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Amber Morefield
26W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jennifer Dugan
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Lynelle Reynolds
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Holiner
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.