Teams

Plungkhen, Andrew

2024 Adult Tri-Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · Mens 3.0,3.5,4.0 Tri Level

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-24vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Plungkhen / Kelcei Glasgow vs David Coleman / Peter Riggs6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndy Bonner / Mark Johnson vs Brad Jones / Tom Rosewicz6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Nagy / Logan McCamon vs Thomas Brown / Jerry Martin6-3, 6-3
2024-08-17vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMWon 20
W#2 DoublesJuan Carlos Baldelomar / Noah Blank vs Tom Rosewicz / Peter Riggs6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBruce Alexander / Scott Doherty vs Jerry Martin / Bruce Allen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-10vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndy Bonner / Scott Fowler vs David Borberg / Steve Marso2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHunter Vincent / Mark Johnson vs Jason Wartman / David Coleman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBruce Alexander / Allen Meyer vs Bruce Allen / Ian McDonald4-6, 4-6
2024-08-03vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Fowler / Mark Johnson vs Kevin Jackson / S Blake Welch0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWill Polese / Hunter Vincent vs Jason Wartman / Peter Riggs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKyle Nagy / Allen Meyer vs Jerry Martin / Ian McDonald3-6, 6-7
2024-07-27vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAndrew Plungkhen / Kelcei Glasgow vs Tom Rosewicz / Jason Wartman7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAllen Meyer / Scott Doherty vs Bruce Allen / Jerry Martin6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2024-07-20vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Plungkhen / Andy Bonner vs Kevin Jackson / James Merwald3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJuan Carlos Baldelomar / Kelcei Glasgow vs Brad Jones / Peter Riggs6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLogan McCamon / Scott Doherty vs Thomas Brown / Jerry Martin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-13vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Plungkhen / Will Polese vs S Blake Welch / Steve Marso1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndy Bonner / Hunter Vincent vs James Merwald / Jason Wartman4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKyle Nagy / Scott Doherty vs Thomas Brown / Ian McDonald6-1, 6-0
2024-07-06vs HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriMLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Murphy / Scott Fowler vs Randy Burgess / James Merwald1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Johnson / Kelcei Glasgow vs Jason Wartman / Tom Rosewicz6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKyle Nagy / Bruce Alexander vs Ian McDonald / Bruce Allen0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mens 3.0,3.5,4.0 Tri Level
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Burgess/TLow-TriM53121227227
2Plungkhen, Andrew35121227208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kelcei Glasgow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Andy Bonner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Noah Blank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Juan Carlos Baldelomar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Andrew Plungkhen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Hunter Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Scott Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Kyle Nagy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Bruce Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.62
Allen Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Logan McCamon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Will Polese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle Nagy + Hunter Vincent5249% games+6.7% vs expected
Kyle Nagy + Bruce Alexander3443% games+1.5% vs expected
Scott Doherty + Bruce Alexander224 matchesnot enough data
Kelcei Glasgow + Andy Bonner303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Doherty + Kyle Nagy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelcei Glasgow
21W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
3.5
Andy Bonner
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Noah Blank
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Juan Carlos Baldelomar
36W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrew Plungkhen
33W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Hunter Vincent
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Scott Doherty
32W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
Kyle Nagy
36W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
3.5
Bruce Alexander
20W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Allen Meyer
12W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.62
Logan McCamon
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Johnson
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Fowler
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Will Polese
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.