Teams

Blossom Bling

2025 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 W Thursday

13 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-16vs FOR FireballsLost 23
W#1 DoublesNancy Hardwick / Paige Henning vs Claudia Burkhardt / Sheila Gentry6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Merwarth vs Melissa Wilson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKay Hendrix / Katherine Larsen vs Kathy Burkholder / Jacqueline Gross4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Shafer / Maria Guerra vs Barbara Vance / Sharon Winter3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#4 DoublesZoanne Zapata / Miranda Hoffpauir vs Yvonne Uhl / Amy Hall2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Paige Henning
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Nancy Hardwick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Michelle Merwarth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Lisa Crawford
published
3.34
Kay Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Katherine Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Leanna Davis
published
3.20
Lindsay Barton
published
3.11
Donna Shafer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Maria Guerra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Sandy Brieden
published
2.97
Zoanne Zapata
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Miranda Hoffpauir
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Barton + Nancy Hardwick5163% games+7.6% vs expected
Kay Hendrix + Nancy Hardwick8158% games+4.6% vs expected
Maria Guerra + Paige Henning3260% games+3.7% vs expected
Kay Hendrix + Lindsay Barton5649% games−1.2% vs expected
Katherine Larsen + Kay Hendrix4551% games−5.6% vs expected
Leanna Davis + Lindsay Barton3244% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Barton + Zoanne Zapata044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Crawford + Maria Guerra134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Henning
23W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
Nancy Hardwick
30W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Michelle Merwarth
29W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Lisa Crawford
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kay Hendrix
30W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Katherine Larsen
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Leanna Davis
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Lindsay Barton
26W–35L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Donna Shafer
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Maria Guerra
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Sandy Brieden
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Zoanne Zapata
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Miranda Hoffpauir
9W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.