Teams

You had me at Tennis (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.94 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-08-05vs Shepard's Flock (40+)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Deborah Wright0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnne McKissick / Debbie Wall vs Katherine Battista / Jennifer Shepard3-6, 2-6
2021-07-27vs Squirrels in Traffic (40+)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Hong / Tannan Hagyard vs Anne Schaefer / Jennifer Schied2-6, 3-6
2021-07-19vs Super Tennis Chicks (40+)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne McKissick / Anne Conklin vs Chanhee Ro / Jin Lee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesShannon Biggs / Andrea Smolen vs Bernadette Madera / Karen Milligan5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-19vs Rally Girls 3.0 (40+)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Amy Flynn1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lippy / Andrea Smolen vs Veronica Best / Monica DeAgostino6-7, 3-3
2021-06-16vs Squirrels in Traffic (40+)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Shari Albert6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Shannon Biggs vs Christy Hull / Susan Golden6-4, 6-4
2021-06-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs Deborah Wright0-6, 2-6
2021-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Patty Cleckler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-22vs The ZingersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnne McKissick / Michele Barron vs Mary Bielefeld / Susan Houck7-6, 3-3
L#1 SinglesTannan Hagyard vs HELLEN IBARRA1-6, 3-6
2021-05-20vs Ladies of the Net 3.0 (40+)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Tannan Hagyard vs Amy Champion / Kristin Ostlie1-6, 3-6
2021-05-13vs Rally Girls 3.0 (40+)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRayane Clark / Tannan Hagyard vs Brenda Poore / Leigh Leslie6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Beth Berry
published 3.5
2.77
Anne McKissick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Ellen Hong
published 3
2.76
Andrea Smolen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Angela Gardner
published 3
2.75
Shannon Biggs
published
2.53
Anne Conklin
published 3
2.34
Tannan Hagyard
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.04
Dale Templeton
published 2.5
Michele Barron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Biggs + Andrea Smolen4251% games+7.0% vs expected
Andrea Smolen + Tannan Hagyard2445% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Biggs + Tannan Hagyard213 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Smolen + Anne McKissick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Berry
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Anne McKissick
94W–129L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ellen Hong
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andrea Smolen
170W–219L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Angela Gardner
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Shannon Biggs
18W–30L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Anne Conklin
8W–14L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
2.53
2.5
Tannan Hagyard
36W–85L career · 8 lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Dale Templeton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Michele Barron
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.