← Teams

SAC-Anderson/Elmer

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.05 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Frank Ferschweiler
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.90
Nathan Watson
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Lee Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Steve Elmer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Bhaskara Bandi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Bret Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Brian Chapler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Mauro Kobrinsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Brian Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Craig Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Dave Sato
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesNathan Watson / Bhaskara Bandi vs Luis Ponce de Leon / William Seidl6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesFrank Ferschweiler vs Jack Conners6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDave Sato / Brian Chapler vs Brian DuVal / Doug Cooke6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMauro Kobrinsky / Zach Barnes vs Paul Ecker / Kevin Franck6-4, 7-6
2024-06-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCraig Walker / Steve Elmer vs Paul Garrahan / Brian Hefele6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNathan Watson / Jonathan Chun vs Jay Hopson / Brendan Finn7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesZach Barnes / Mauro Kobrinsky vs David Graham / Scott Inukai2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLee Anderson / Nathan Watson vs Ed de la Fuente / Dale Christensen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFrank Ferschweiler vs Zhong Lei6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Chapler / Dave Sato vs Keith Westrum / Terrence Trausch7-5, 6-3
2024-05-25Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesNathan Watson / Craig Walker vs Frank Brown / Jacob Boston6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFrank Ferschweiler vs Steven Darling6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrian Chapler / Brian Harvey vs Mike Olson / Jack Crossen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesZach Barnes / Bret Crawford vs Wesley Eader / Kevin Grant6-4, 6-1
2024-05-18Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesCraig Walker / Lee Anderson vs William Seidl / Tate Kuerbis7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSteve Elmer vs Kevin Hanzlik6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNathan Watson / Bhaskara Bandi vs Jason Bolt / Brad Mathewson6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBret Crawford / Dave Sato vs Jack Conners / Kevin Franck6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-11Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesNathan Watson / Steve Elmer vs Mike Olson / Gregory Foster6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFrank Ferschweiler vs Terry Bennett7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Chapler / Bhaskara Bandi vs Todd Berinstein / Kevin Grant6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrian Harvey / Jonathan Chun vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesLee Anderson / Craig Walker vs Lars Kasch / Joseph M Heffernan III6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBhaskara Bandi / Brian Harvey vs Michael Parkhurst / David Floyd6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKyle Kim / Bret Crawford vs Steve DeKlotz / Evan Simons6-1, 6-1
2024-04-14Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesNathan Watson / Bhaskara Bandi vs Erik Bucher / Matthew Majewski6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSteve Elmer vs Benjamin Weston7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMauro Kobrinsky / Jonathan Chun vs JAMES KYUNG / Chris Hartson6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDave Sato / Zach Barnes vs Scott Thomas / Gary Wallesen6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Frank Ferschweiler
77W–41L career
0%98%2%
3.33
3
Nathan Watson
32W–41L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Lee Anderson
45W–53L career
0%94%6%
2.86
3
Steve Elmer
61W–77L career
0%94%5%
2.86
3
Bhaskara Bandi
23W–16L career
not enough data
—
3
Bret Crawford
13W–44L career
not enough data
—
3
Brian Chapler
10W–12L career
not enough data
—
3
Mauro Kobrinsky
14W–23L career
5%93%2%
2.75
3
Brian Harvey
15W–20L career
4%95%1%
2.73
3
Craig Walker
32W–39L career
11%85%3%
2.71
3
Dave Sato
40W–110L career
31%69%0%
2.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.