Teams

Team 9 Belle Haven 3.0

2025 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-28vs Team 11 On the RisersWon 41
W#1 DoublesJohn Alspaugh / Daniel Evens vs Eugene Mok / Michael Hubona6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTimothy Cameron vs Jags Beda1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Skladany / Kevin Mack vs Justin Pigott / Stuart Sears7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMark Libell vs Brendan Mcglynn6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRaul Cancelado / Evan Ryan vs Donald Clarke / Randall Garrett Rust6-4, 6-4
2025-05-21vs Team 1 Lunar LegendsLost 23
L#1 DoublesJohn Alspaugh / Daniel Evens vs Han Wang / Yu-ping Su7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEvan Ryan vs Jie Wang2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Skladany / Kevin Mack vs Renxi Xu / Xuanjia Bi6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesPhil Jones vs Jesse Tu0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRaul Cancelado / Michael Lambert vs Mingchu Xu / Yingqiao Xiong6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Tim Kane
published
3.12
Abe Adams
published 3
3.11
Ryan Meerstein
published
3.01
Phil Jones
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Matthew Skladany
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
John Alspaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Daniel Evens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Kevin Mack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Evan Ryan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Raul Cancelado
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Shawn Lucas
published
Mark Libell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Timothy Cameron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Meerstein + Abe Adams7078% games+15.2% vs expected
Kevin Mack + Matthew Skladany6260% games+6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Kane
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3
Abe Adams
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Ryan Meerstein
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Phil Jones
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Matthew Skladany
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
John Alspaugh
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Daniel Evens
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kevin Mack
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Evan Ryan
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raul Cancelado
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Shawn Lucas
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Mark Libell
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Cameron
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.