Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.5M/Gandarilla/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/4.5M/Gandarilla/EPTC#281331232338
2GEPTA/18&over/4.5M/Maese/EPTC#445202559440
3GEPTA/18&over/4.5M/Friedl/EPTC#336192658422
4GEPTA/18&over/4.5M/Duarte/EPTC#136162966463

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Abraham Gandarilla
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Alex Anoveros
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 4.5
4.28
Anthony Ellsworth
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
4.21
Adrian Guevara
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
John Moore
published 4
Eric Jurecky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Juan Uraga
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Nicholas Spurbeck
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Peter Jilkov
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Rene Archuleta
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Tony Magana
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Ulrich Delafuente
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrian Guevara + Tony Magana3450% gamesnot enough data
Adrian Guevara + Anthony Ellsworth4256% gamesnot enough data
Eric Jurecky + Nicholas Spurbeck5168% gamesnot enough data
Eric Jurecky + Ulrich Delafuente6070% gamesnot enough data
Alex Anoveros + Anthony Ellsworth314 matchesnot enough data
Alex Anoveros + Tony Magana314 matchesnot enough data
Adrian Guevara + Abraham Gandarilla314 matchesnot enough data
Alex Anoveros + Adrian Guevara033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abraham Gandarilla
71W–41L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Alex Anoveros
42W–43L career · 14 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Anthony Ellsworth
13W–7L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Adrian Guevara
51W–34L career · 14 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4
John Moore
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Eric Jurecky
40W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Uraga
89W–29L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas Spurbeck
23W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Jilkov
12W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rene Archuleta
54W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Magana
87W–41L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ulrich Delafuente
61W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.