Teams

V - Las Posas Love Bites

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WD · V - Women 3.5 WD

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-29vs V - WACettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Gisler / Shannon Price vs Jackie Guinn / Susan Cass3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-03vs V - Sunset Bad Ace BeachesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Gisler / Dana Lavenant vs Deborah Cassar / SANDI WISE6-1, 6-4
2023-10-25vs V - Malibu RacqueteersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Gisler / Lisa Weckbacher vs Holly Culhane / Diane Audeon6-3, 6-1
2023-10-05vs V - North Ranch Wonder WomenLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Gisler / Shannon Price vs Lisa Iezza / Sonia Bekian2-6, 2-6
2023-09-22vs V - Mission Oaks Parks and WreckLost 01
L#3 DoublesGinger Kohler / Michelle Ubertino vs Annie Kakuk / Leilani Mayer4-6, 4-6
2023-09-13vs V - Mission Oaks Love HurtsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Gisler / Dana Lavenant vs Kristin Pena / Myla Hanson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Barbara Sandrasagra
published 3.5
3.29
Carrie Kelleher
published 3.5
3.25
Tera Williams
published
3.24
Jaimee Seay
published 3.5
3.24
Amy Galan
published 3.5
3.20
Julie Gisler
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jill Spasiano
published
3.19
Shannon Price
published
3.15
Kelly Deardorff
published
3.08
Deanna Sonnenberg
published 3.5
3.07
Laura Kiker
published
2.57
Ginger Kohler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lisa Weckbacher
published
Wendy Spasiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Gisler + Kelly Deardorff4168% games+5.8% vs expected
Tera Williams + Jaimee Seay6256% games+5.1% vs expected
Ginger Kohler + Julie Gisler123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Galan + Shannon Price123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Sandrasagra
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Carrie Kelleher
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Tera Williams
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jaimee Seay
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Amy Galan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Julie Gisler
124W–126L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Jill Spasiano
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Shannon Price
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Kelly Deardorff
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Deanna Sonnenberg
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Laura Kiker
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Ginger Kohler
24W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Lisa Weckbacher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Spasiano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.