Teams

GT Bray Proulx

2023 Sarasota Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 8.0 MXD Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-25vs Sarasota/Rosenberg/Mixed18&Over8.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard Arndt / Beth Arndt vs David Rosenberg / Emily Weitekamp3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Lizares / Cynthia Norwood vs Tom Heidenberger / Sandra Poston3-6, 3-6
2023-06-19vs SSC RisquezLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Arndt / Beth Arndt vs Scott Temple / Agnes Toth1-6, 5-7
2023-06-04vs Payne Park Gibson MXDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnthony Lizares / Celia Pena vs Bjorn Turnquist / Cindy Davis6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Arndt / Richard Arndt vs Sergio Molinari / Fabiola Beckmann7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-21vs LWR AndersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesReny Abraham / Cynthia Norwood vs Joe Malave / Christie Boylston1-6, 2-6
2023-05-14vs SSC RisquezLost 01
L#2 DoublesReny Abraham / Roda Rucks vs Scott Temple / Livia Alcantara4-6, 4-6
2023-04-30vs Sarasota/Rosenberg/Mixed18&Over8.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Arndt / Beth Arndt vs Dustin Keith / Cindy Rosenberg2-6, 2-6
2023-04-23vs Payne Park Gibson MXDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesWayne Osher / Celia Pena vs Fabiola Beckmann / Sergio Molinari4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRoda Rucks / Reny Abraham vs Stacey Allerton / Marc Pommainville6-2, 7-6
2023-04-16vs LWR AndersonWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnthony Lizares / Celia Pena vs Gina Damaia / Joe Malave6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Tracy Fang
published
Anthony Lizares
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Richard Arndt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Celia Pena
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Reny Abraham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Marcia Frost
published
3.27
Jeffrey Bucarion
published
Cameron Jones
published 3.5
3.23
Beth Arndt
published 3.5
Wayne Osher
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Fang
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Anthony Lizares
96W–97L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Arndt
60W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Celia Pena
68W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Reny Abraham
81W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
Jeffrey Bucarion
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Cameron Jones
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Beth Arndt
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Wayne Osher
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.