Teams

ETC-etera et cetera-Kamo

2022 Coed 18-39 · 3.0 Coed

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-13vs BTA-Lau and OrderWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesKatharine Mancini / Lauren Nishikawa vs Jessmin Lau / Anita Zhen6-2
L#1 Female SinglesKatharine Mancini vs Jessmin Lau1-6
W#1 Male DoublesSimon Hsu / Norris Kamo vs Rick Miaw / Bruce Saberton6-2
2022-02-26vs BTA-AzizWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesKatharine Mancini / Cat Zhang vs Donna Kim / Florlyn Faith Varanal6-3
W#1 Female SinglesKatharine Mancini vs Donna Kim6-1
W#1 Male SinglesKiffin Chu vs Naveed Aziz6-0
2022-02-20vs BTA-Lau and OrderLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesKatharine Mancini / Cat Zhang vs Jessmin Lau / Anita Zhen4-6
L#1 Female SinglesCat Zhang vs Anita Zhen4-6
L#1 Male SinglesNorris Kamo vs Bruce Saberton1-6
2022-02-12Won 20
W#1 Female DoublesJutta Maas / Katharine Mancini vs Amy Chang / Donna Kim6-0
W#1 Female SinglesKatharine Mancini vs Rachelle Muzones6-1
2022-02-06vs BTA-AzizWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesJutta Maas / Cat Zhang vs Amy Chang / Donna Kim6-3
W#1 Female SinglesCat Zhang vs Rachelle Muzones6-2
L#1 Male SinglesNorris Kamo vs Naveed Aziz1-6
2022-01-22vs BTA-Lau and OrderLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesKatharine Mancini / Lauren Nishikawa vs Jessmin Lau / Anita Zhen3-6
L#1 Female SinglesKatharine Mancini vs Jessmin Lau3-6
L#1 Male DoublesKiffin Chu / Stefan Huynh vs Rick Miaw / Bruce Saberton2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Coed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA-Lau and Order06211515144
2ETC-etera et cetera-Kamo06171919154
3BTA-Aziz06162020162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Cat Zhang
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Jutta Maas
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kiffin Chu
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Singles 50% · published
2.90
Katharine Mancini
usually #1 Female Singles 80%, also #1 Female Doubles 20% · published 3
Lauren Nishikawa
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Norris Kamo
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 3
Stefan Huynh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Nishikawa + Katharine Mancini123 matchesnot enough data
Jutta Maas + Norris Kamo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cat Zhang
126W–73L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
3.5
Jutta Maas
100W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Kiffin Chu
51W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Katharine Mancini
98W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Lauren Nishikawa
42W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Norris Kamo
47W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Stefan Huynh
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.