Teams

State College - Duffie

Northern Tier - 18 & Over Adults · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnastasia Piliouras vs Kelly Glinski6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-25Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristan Padula / Susan Towns vs Anastasia Piliouras / Peggy Duffie6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPaula Smeal vs Gabriela Rivera0-6, 4-6
2023-06-18vs State College - PegSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristan Padula / Mariant Gutierrez vs Jessica Mongilio / Gwen Schoonmaker6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Snyder / Paula Smeal vs Nicole Benincasa / Sarah Phillips6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-18Won 21
W#1 SinglesKristan Padula vs Gabriela Rivera3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnastasia Piliouras / Sarah Richards vs Janet Bristol / Deb Johnson1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Smeal vs Natasha Miles6-0, 6-2
2023-06-06vs State College - PegSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaula Smeal / Maria Snyder vs Carina Curto / Gwen Schoonmaker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDanielle Trego vs Amelia Dodoo6-0, 6-2
2023-05-20vs State College - PegWon 20
W#1 DoublesMariant Gutierrez / Anastasia Piliouras vs Sarah Phillips / Carina Curto3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaria Snyder vs Amelia Dodoo6-0, 6-1
2023-05-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Benincasa / Anastasia Piliouras vs Paula Smeal / Susan Towns7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1State College - Duffie03451173
2State College - Peg03271699

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anastasia Piliouras
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Smeal
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.79
Peggy Duffie
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Danielle Trego
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kristan Padula
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Maria Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mariant Gutierrez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Towns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Smeal + Susan Towns2451% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Duffie + Anastasia Piliouras033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anastasia Piliouras
23W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Smeal
21W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Peggy Duffie
21W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
Danielle Trego
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kristan Padula
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Snyder
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mariant Gutierrez
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Towns
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.