Teams

J.KIM

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs T.BorsukLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Page / Dana Rawls vs Jenny Nguyen / Susan Hill3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Ice / Adrienne Padilla vs Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk / Carrie Couto6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMolly Briggs / Heidi Duggins vs Samantha Starr / Leslie Weaver2-6, 3-6
2023-05-04vs H.HarrisLost 02
L#2 DoublesDana Rawls / Sherrie Lefere vs Kylie Harris / Sarah Breazeale4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Padilla / Heidi Duggins vs Susan Cook / Michelle Welborn4-6, 4-6
2023-04-20vs H.BrewerLost 02
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Padilla / Lynne Manweiler vs Anne Elizabeth Harrell / Julie Sullivan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Rawls / Karen Ice vs Amy Pena / Erin Swindell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-13vs H.Williams18Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Winston Henderson vs Tonya Chapman / Elisabeth McMahon6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDana Chapman / Sherrie Lefere vs Meggy Campbell / Mollie Cozart6-7, 6-7
2023-03-30vs T.BorsukWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Briggs / Dana Rawls vs Jenny Nguyen / Cherie Scholes1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Adrienne Padilla vs Susan Hill / Ruth Smith5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Ice / Sherrie Lefere vs Carrie Couto / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-23vs I.CBASONWon 21
L#1 DoublesWinston Henderson / Lynne Manweiler vs Chris Bason / KATRINA SIZEMORE1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Page / Karen Ice vs Robin Sealey / Cynthia Callahan3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Chapman / Adrienne Padilla vs Julie Fleming / Jane Hunter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-16vs C.TEAMWon 20
W#1 DoublesWinston Henderson / Lynne Manweiler vs Christy Team / Lynda McDonell7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Briggs / Dana Rawls vs Elizabeth Minto / Jennie Williams7-5, 6-1
2023-03-09vs H.HarrisWon 20
W#2 DoublesDana Chapman / Julia Kim vs Rebecca Procter / Elizabeth Samuels6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDana Rawls / Karen Ice vs Sarah Breazeale / Kylie Harris6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Molly Briggs
published
3.80
Winston Henderson
published
3.77
Julia Kim
published
3.68
Annette Page
published 4
3.61
Karen Ice
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Lynne Manweiler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Dana Rawls
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Ann Skvarcius
published 3.5
3.41
Sherrie Lefere
published
3.32
Dana Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Duggins
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ice + Dana Rawls5653% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Duggins + Dana Chapman5058% gamesnot enough data
Annette Page + Molly Briggs404 matchesnot enough data
Molly Briggs + Dana Rawls303 matchesnot enough data
Molly Briggs + Winston Henderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Briggs
32W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
Winston Henderson
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
Julia Kim
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.77
4
Annette Page
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Karen Ice
101W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Lynne Manweiler
90W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Dana Rawls
129W–110L career · 6 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Ann Skvarcius
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
Sherrie Lefere
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Dana Chapman
56W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Heidi Duggins
95W–121L career · 8 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.