Teams

Cober 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AM

2025 Piedmont Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women 65 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#2 DoublesDenise Fiery / Martha Mitman vs Judy Eaton / Linda Chapman2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSpoma Jovanovic / Meredith Patterson vs Michelle Harris / Ila Rosenthal3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesEmily Crenshaw / Denise Fiery vs Ann Zuraw / Michelle Shoemaker3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Waddell / Meredith Patterson vs Betty Haggard / Margaret Lynde-Rhyne4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGinny Nelson / Spoma Jovanovic vs Missy Chance / Janet Gorham6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesAnn PORTER / Emily Crenshaw vs Betty Haggard / Dana Marpoe3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSpoma Jovanovic / Betsy Wood vs Margaret Lynde-Rhyne / Gloria Eckman3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Smith / Ginny Nelson vs Kathy Chinnis / Janet Gorham4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Allison Waddell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ann PORTER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Denise Fiery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Spoma Jovanovic
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Susan Harvey
published
2.81
Martha Mitman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Crenshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ginny Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Glenda Burkett
published 3
2.63
Jill van Veen
published
2.58
Betsy Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Donna Range
published 3
Meredith Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann PORTER + Allison Waddell224 matchesnot enough data
Martha Mitman + Susan Harvey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Waddell
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Ann PORTER
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Denise Fiery
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Spoma Jovanovic
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.94
Susan Harvey
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Martha Mitman
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Emily Crenshaw
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ginny Nelson
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Glenda Burkett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill van Veen
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Betsy Wood
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Donna Range
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Meredith Patterson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.