Teams

BP - Eichelberger

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 40 & Over (Men) - Winter

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-01-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Eichelberger / Charles Herman vs Erik Bernstein / John Gloistein6-3, 7-6
2026-01-08vs SQ - EberleWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Graham / Charles Herman vs Chris Hendley / James Sizemore6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 SATA USTA Adult 40 & Over (Men) - Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sherwood Silliman
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.36
Derwin Roland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Jeffrey Graham
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.26
Stephen Rashleigh
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.23
Billy Steinhauser
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Kevin Eichelberger
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
3.17
Timothy Clemm
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Andy White
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.11
Barry Hill
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.02
Charles Herman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Eric Ricciardelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derwin Roland + Stephen Rashleigh5551% games+4.9% vs expected
Kevin Eichelberger + Sherwood Silliman4453% games−0.3% vs expected
Kevin Eichelberger + Stephen Rashleigh2546% games−6.2% vs expected
Barry Hill + Billy Steinhauser044 matchesnot enough data
Derwin Roland + Kevin Eichelberger044 matchesnot enough data
Billy Steinhauser + Sherwood Silliman404 matchesnot enough data
Barry Hill + Sherwood Silliman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherwood Silliman
16W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Derwin Roland
13W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Jeffrey Graham
20W–12L career · 17 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Stephen Rashleigh
7W–17L career · 13 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Billy Steinhauser
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Kevin Eichelberger
21W–24L career · 14 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Timothy Clemm
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Andy White
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Barry Hill
9W–27L career · 15 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Charles Herman
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Eric Ricciardelli
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.