Teams

Frog-Hamlett

Adult Tri-Level League · 2023 Women's 4.5 Tri-Level Wed Indian Wells

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMarisa Grotell / LAURA KING vs Catherine Grimes / Kristin Kobell6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-11-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMarisa Grotell / LAURA KING vs Kim Morris / Michele Mckenna0-6, 2-6
2021-10-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMarisa Grotell / LAURA KING vs Allyson Yost / Michelle Meinhart6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSunny HASSETT / LAURA KING vs Allyson Yost / Michelle Meinhart1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-09-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesSunny HASSETT / LAURA KING vs Marie Dollfus / Veronica Freer6-4, 6-3
2021-09-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesSunny HASSETT / LAURA KING vs Zita Munro / Kathleen Cameron6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2023 Women's 4.5 Tri-Level Wed Indian Wells
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pennsbury Tricksters000000
2Frog-Hamlett000000
34.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Toni Hamlett
published 4
3.46
LAURA KING
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Carla Kotik
published 3
Susan Hoog
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Kotik + LAURA KING0637% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Toni Hamlett
160W–246L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
LAURA KING
62W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3
Carla Kotik
40W–79L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
Susan Hoog
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.