Teams

Team Ramsey-Steers and Beers//OKC

2022 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 5.0

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-13vs OK/Weber/18&over 5.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStefan Walia / Kevin Hill vs Ryan Weber / Douglas Rodwell7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBart Ramsey vs Braxton Bates0-6, 3-6
2022-06-06vs OK/Weber/18&over 5.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesBart Ramsey / Andrew Cabato vs Ryan Weber / Evan Piche3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKevin Hill vs Braxton Bates0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStefan Walia / Mike Lofdahl vs Colby Crawford / Roger Lanier6-2, 7-5
2022-05-16vs OK/Weber/18&over 5.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBart Ramsey / Mike Lofdahl vs Ryan Weber / Evan Piche3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStefan Walia / Andrew Cabato vs Colby Crawford / Douglas Rodwell6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-09vs OK/Weber/18&over 5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesStefan Walia / Andrew Cabato vs Ryan Weber / Evan Piche2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBart Ramsey vs John Sedlak0-6
2022-04-25vs OK/Weber/18&over 5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesBart Ramsey / Mike Lofdahl vs Ryan Weber / Evan Piche2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Cabato / Stefan Walia vs John Sedlak / Braxton Bates6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-18vs OK/Weber/18&over 5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesBart Ramsey / Stefan Walia vs Roger Lanier / Douglas Rodwell2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMike Lofdahl vs Ryan Weber5-7, 4-6
2022-04-11vs OK/Weber/18&over 5.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStefan Walia / Andrew Cabato vs Ryan Weber / Evan Piche3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMike Lofdahl vs Roger Lanier7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Weber/18&over 5.0M7016511133
2Team Ramsey-Steers and Beers//OKC0741735234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Cabato
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
Bart Ramsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Kevin Hill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Mike Lofdahl
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published
Stefan Walia
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefan Walia + Andrew Cabato2355% games+4.1% vs expected
Bart Ramsey + Stefan Walia044 matchesnot enough data
Bart Ramsey + Mike Lofdahl044 matchesnot enough data
Stefan Walia + Kevin Hill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Cabato
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bart Ramsey
19W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Hill
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Lofdahl
89W–39L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stefan Walia
8W–10L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.