Teams

LPTC RED

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs WP BLUEWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesAllison Abrams vs Kelly Harvey6-2, 6-0
2022-07-11vs LTA REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesEmma Tiernon / Katherine Ashley vs Paige Schauermann / Mary Scharrer6-4, 6-1
2022-07-09vs CP BLUEWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesAllison Abrams / Molly Burke vs Lauren Hanzlik / Chelsea Taylor6-1, 6-0
W#1 Female SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Annalisa Averill6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-27vs KNO NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKatherine Ashley / Emma Tiernon vs Andrea Fitch / Brittany Wyeno6-0, 6-1
2022-06-20vs NJ NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMolly Burke / Allison Abrams vs Rachel Eng / Daryna Piria6-1, 6-2
2022-06-06vs HW REDWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Eli Boone7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LPTC RED5213817154
2NJ NAVY5212919161
3WP BLUE4391227189
4HW RED34111021174
5CP BLUE34101123195
6SSD RED1681329209
7KNO NAVY0741735226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Allison Abrams
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Molly Burke
published
3.13
Emma Tiernon
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Michelle Dolin
published
Katherine Ashley
published
Megan Lewis
published
Taylor Willow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Abrams + Molly Burke39166% games+10.7% vs expected
Emma Tiernon + Katherine Ashley8461% games+6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Abrams
63W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
Molly Burke
59W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Emma Tiernon
53W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Michelle Dolin
62W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Katherine Ashley
38W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Lewis
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Taylor Willow
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.