Teams

Alfonso/Memphis

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 4.0 Women 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Stuart/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Ford / Luz Scallion vs Lynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSUSAN WOODMAN / Barb Lansky vs Lil Rudd / Ashley Wallace4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Rieves / Courtney Wright vs Cathy Sumrall / Jennifer Magee7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2026-04-26vs Martin/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Throckmorton / SUSAN WOODMAN vs Stacey Hyde / Laura Hollis-Talley6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Conrad / Rachel Rieves vs Jennifer Goodnight / Jorianne Siskin6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Alfonso / Barb Lansky vs Laura Fortenberry / Hanh Vaught6-1, 6-4
2026-04-19vs Higgins/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesStacey Dunevant / SUSAN WOODMAN vs Anne Higgins / Kathleen Cates6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlison Smith / Gina Throckmorton vs Leslie Barron / Lori Jones7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarb Lansky / Patricia Alfonso vs Melony Bratton / Donna Coffman6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Eddy/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Ford / Luz Scallion vs Jennifer OConnell / Vonya Day6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGina Throckmorton / Courtney Wright vs Kristy Pelt / Marnie Denman3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Alfonso / Deborah Kershner vs Alison Drago / Beth McKnight3-6, 3-6
2026-03-29vs Higgins/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuz Scallion / Deborah Kershner vs Leslie Barron / Lori Jones6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Conrad / Stacey Dunevant vs Anne Higgins / Nancy Goodwin1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Alfonso / Rachel Rieves vs Mallie Nagle / Donna Wolfanger6-4, 6-2
2026-03-22vs Ansbro/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacey Dunevant / Julie Ford vs Jenny Branston / Susan Ogg3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Conrad / Luz Scallion vs Silvia Hecht / Elizabeth Woodmansee6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGina Throckmorton / Patricia Alfonso vs Dee Pitawanakwat / Gwen Basinger3-6, 2-6
2026-03-08vs Stuart/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuz Scallion / Julie Ford vs Kimberly Laschober / Vivian Gresham5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Conrad / SUSAN WOODMAN vs Lynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Alfonso / Stacey Dunevant vs Jennifer Magee / Debbie Walker-Hulette7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Martin/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Alfonso / Stacey Dunevant vs Cindy Miller / Jorianne Siskin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSUSAN WOODMAN / Alison Smith vs Kristi Sides / Jennifer Wright5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Conrad / Luz Scallion vs Missy Gulick / Hanh Vaught6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Luz Scallion
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.68
Stacey Dunevant
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
SUSAN WOODMAN
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Gina Throckmorton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Barb Lansky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.42
Deborah Kershner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Rachel Rieves
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.26
Patricia Alfonso
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.20
Judy Butterfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Rebecca Conrad
usually #2 Doubles 90%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published
3.10
Courtney Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Kershner + Patricia Alfonso6260% games+10.4% vs expected
Deborah Kershner + Judy Butterfield303 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Rieves + Barb Lansky213 matchesnot enough data
SUSAN WOODMAN + Gina Throckmorton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luz Scallion
16W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Stacey Dunevant
16W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
SUSAN WOODMAN
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Gina Throckmorton
1W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Barb Lansky
38W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Deborah Kershner
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Rachel Rieves
12W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Patricia Alfonso
16W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Judy Butterfield
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Rebecca Conrad
25W–31L career · 10 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Courtney Wright
23W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.