Teams

Burkwood Clark

2022 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-07vs Westwood - Payne / HassettWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Virginia Bowie vs Lil Racelis / SanDee Gammon7-5, 3-1
2022-08-02vs TDC CarlyleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberley Winn / Mary Allen vs Alice Ulrichs / Margaret Duke2-6, 4-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesModestine Carter / Cynthia Dunivan vs Nancy Mihalko / Sheri Carlyle6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-18vs ACAC LarueSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Modestine Carter vs Kathryn Williams / Denise Weisberg7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Allen / Kimberley Winn vs Linda Wood / Maureen Sisti4-6, 3-6
2022-07-13vs RMC FlowersWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Virginia Bowie vs Victoria Galiffa / Kathy Flowers6-3, 6-1
2022-07-11vs TCRC SchweitzerWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberley Winn / Mary Allen vs Melissa Skorupa / Michele Asher7-5, 6-1
2022-06-20vs Burkwood SweeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Cynthia Dunivan vs Frances Poehler / Ellen Bedichek4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-13vs Raintree Bryan / Bullard 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Dunivan / Modestine Carter vs Julie Scott / Amy Boschen7-5, 7-5
2022-06-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Modestine Carter vs Paula Bissett / Crystal Hull6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Modestine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.33
Kimberley Winn
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Virginia Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Ann Abernathy
published 3
2.70
Carolyn Shute
published 3
Mary Allen
published
Melissa Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Bowie + Modestine Carter311159% games−0.5% vs expected
Carolyn Shute + Mary Allen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Modestine Carter
219W–132L career · 7 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Kimberley Winn
57W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
Virginia Bowie
100W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Ann Abernathy
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Carolyn Shute
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Mary Allen
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Stewart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.