Teams

SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW5.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 5.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-29vs MITCHELL PK CW5.5A-DTLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Beauchamps / Stephanie Patterson vs Suyeon Kwon / Sunny Kim4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCarol Rhodes / Joy Ma vs Jihea Han / Hien Nguyen2-6, 1-6
2025-10-24vs FOOTHILLS TandS CW5.5A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesDana Gifford / Manjiri Patil vs Stacey Wu-Savard / Christine Bruckner4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeri Hoffacker / Stephanie Patterson vs Mallary Alcheck / Leah Caldarone6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Boyer / Keren Kotowitz vs Carole Borie / Stella Lee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-10vs CUESTA TC CW5.5A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesElaine Chen / Manjiri Patil vs Isabel Stroecker / Dimitra Papachristou6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeri Hoffacker / Irina Ushach vs Shilpi Bhargava / Laura Ip6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRegina Eberhart / Celine Warner vs Christine Niebuhr / Elena Mitschkowetz6-3, 6-0
2025-09-22vs MITCHELL PK CW5.5A-DTLost 03
L#1 DoublesRegina Eberhart / Manjiri Patil vs Suyeon Kwon / Sunny Kim0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAya Takeuchi / Celine Warner vs Jessica Yu / Yun Zhang3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Schenone / Stephanie Patterson vs Jihea Han / Ann Kerdchonphet1-6, 2-6
2025-09-18vs FOOTHILLS TandS CW5.5A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Gregg / Irina Ushach vs Stacey Wu-Savard / Dale Tritschler3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElaine Chen / Stephanie Patterson vs Leslie Behar / Mallary Alcheck6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Beauchamps / Celine Warner vs Susanna Ventura / Ree Noh6-2, 6-3
2025-09-02vs CUESTA TC CW5.5A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Gifford / Stephanie Patterson vs Shilpi Bhargava / Dimitra Papachristou6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Beauchamps / Lori Wolfe vs Christine Niebuhr / Linda Daniel6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAya Takeuchi / Tami Adachi vs Demetra Metaxas / Elena Mitschkowetz6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Dana Gifford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Keri Hoffacker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Aya Takeuchi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Manjiri Patil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Elaine Chen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Amy Figueroa
published 3
2.67
Regina Eberhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Emily Boyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Celine Warner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Tiffany Dheedene
published
2.55
Irina Ushach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Amy Gregg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Lori Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Carol Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.29
Tami Adachi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Joy Ma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Rebecca Schenone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Keren Kotowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Beauchamps
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Gifford
22W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.26
Keri Hoffacker
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Aya Takeuchi
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Manjiri Patil
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.82
3
Elaine Chen
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Amy Figueroa
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Regina Eberhart
6W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.67
3
Emily Boyer
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Celine Warner
8W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Tiffany Dheedene
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.56
3
Irina Ushach
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Amy Gregg
7W–14L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Lori Wolfe
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
3
Carol Rhodes
0W–6L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Tami Adachi
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Joy Ma
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.28
Rebecca Schenone
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.19
Keren Kotowitz
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Beauchamps
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.