Teams

HOCO-BENDALL

2025 MATA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Summer · 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-13vs GA 8.5W 40 & Over (Hornsby)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPatsy Bendall / Joanna Roller vs Tara McGowan / Nozipho Lewis42-42
L#2 DoublesKim Joiner / Traci Ludicke vs Sarah Hankamer / Rhonda Harris42-42
L#3 DoublesLeslie Elliott / Sabine Murray vs Robin Dixon / Shanavia Brannam42-42
2025-09-09vs GA 8.5W 40 & Over (Hornsby)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatsy Bendall / Vanessa Brooks vs Anna Lange / Ellen Thomas42-43
L#2 DoublesCatherine Harless / Jennifer Sweenor vs Sarah Witherspoon / Jennifer Hornsby42-42
2025-09-05vs GA 8.5W 40 & Over (Hornsby)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatsy Bendall / Jennifer Sweenor vs Julia Bolden / Sarah Witherspoon42-43
L#2 DoublesVanessa Brooks / Joanna Roller vs Jennifer Hornsby / Ellen Thomas42-43
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Vanessa Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Patsy Bendall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Jennifer Sweenor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Joanna Roller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Traci Ludicke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Kim Joiner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Catherine Harless
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Sabine Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Kelly McClain
published
Leslie Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Brooks + Jennifer Sweenor5056% games+1.5% vs expected
Kim Joiner + Sabine Murray3344% gamesnot enough data
Kim Joiner + Traci Ludicke4154% gamesnot enough data
Sabine Murray + Traci Ludicke4159% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Harless + Sabine Murray303 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Harless + Leslie Elliott123 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Bendall + Traci Ludicke213 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Bendall + Vanessa Brooks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vanessa Brooks
37W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Patsy Bendall
39W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Jennifer Sweenor
39W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Joanna Roller
26W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Traci Ludicke
75W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Kim Joiner
52W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Catherine Harless
21W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sabine Murray
18W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kelly McClain
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Leslie Elliott
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.