Teams

LATA18/Mathias/QV

2025 SC Singles 18 & Over - SC · Adult Women - 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-28vs LATA18/Piper/CAMPWon 30
W#1 SinglesBarbara Belquist vs Jenny Burden6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNonie Morris vs Kayla Jackson6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesTerri Stokes vs Traci Suber4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-20vs LATA18/Price/CAMPLost 12
L#1 SinglesReka Corley vs Lisette Geib3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBrittany Ramsey vs Ashley Hudson3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesTerri Stokes vs Rayanne Moura3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-13vs lata18/bailey/lctcLost 12
L#1 SinglesLibby Mathias vs Torry Dickey1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTerri Stokes vs Patty Spires3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Keilty vs Taylor Wray6-2, 6-0
2025-09-06vs LATA18/Piper/CAMPSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLibby Mathias vs Becky Piper4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNonie Morris vs Kayla Jackson6-3, 7-5
2025-08-30vs lata18/bailey/lctcWon 21
L#1 SinglesBarbara Belquist vs Janis Caccamise1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTerri Stokes vs Kelly Glynn6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBrittany Ramsey vs Marketa Kubickova6-2, 6-4
2025-08-23vs LATA18/Price/CAMPWon 21
L#1 SinglesReka Corley vs Ashley Hudson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLibby Mathias vs Helen Cupertino6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesNonie Morris vs Annagrace Jeffcoat6-3, 6-4
2025-08-16vs lata18/bailey/lctcWon 21
L#1 SinglesBarbara Belquist vs Janis Caccamise4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLibby Mathias vs Kelly Glynn6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesNonie Morris vs Lindsay Copelan6-3, 6-3
2025-08-09vs LATA18/Piper/CAMPLost 03
L#1 SinglesReka Corley vs Kelsey Piotrowski3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTerri Stokes vs Traci Suber2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRebecca Keilty vs Wendel Franklin0-6, 1-6
2025-08-02vs LATA18/Price/CAMPLost 12
L#1 SinglesLibby Mathias vs Lisette Geib6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBarbara Belquist vs Molly Price6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNonie Morris vs Rayanne Moura7-5, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Libby Mathias
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.91
Barbara Belquist
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.89
Reka Corley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Brittany Ramsey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Nonie Morris
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.54
Terri Stokes
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.42
Rebecca Keilty
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Monica Conklin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libby Mathias
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Barbara Belquist
33W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Reka Corley
35W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Brittany Ramsey
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nonie Morris
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Terri Stokes
13W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Rebecca Keilty
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Monica Conklin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.