Teams

CP-Shot Sisters-Essinger

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-08vs TCSP-Super 65's-LullLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeannie Coe / Barb Regan vs Kathy Trumbauer / Ann Bowden2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Loong / Penelope Lee vs Martha Tucker / Connie Ray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Husband / Priscilla Kloess vs Sandy Berlin / Karen Ellentuck5-7, 4-6
2023-05-04vs NWW-BETC-McClearyLost 12
L#1 DoublesConstance Essinger / Elaine Loong vs Ming Vuong / Ruthann Nelson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaylee Nilan / Karen Stalker vs Jill Wakefield / Sally Linebarger0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBarb Regan / Lynn Vona vs Carolyn Cruzat / Mary Jo Leonardson6-4, 7-5
2023-04-24vs HBSQ-TierneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesConstance Essinger / Kaylee Nilan vs Susan Fyall / Joyce Tierney4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPenelope Lee / Lynn Vona vs Maurene Cronyn / Pamela Steele2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPriscilla Kloess / Jeannie Coe vs JR Thompson / Liz Smalley5-7, 1-6
2023-04-18vs RBW-Howe NiceLost 12
W#1 DoublesConstance Essinger / Kaylee Nilan vs Lia Morrison / Susan Leiter6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarb Regan / Marilyn Pedersen vs Holly Conley / Stacey Roehrs1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLili Chang / Penelope Lee vs Cynthia Moller / Lauri Iwasaki7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-04vs HBSQ-GillespieWon 21
W#1 DoublesConstance Essinger / Karen Stalker vs Charlotte Lohman / Karen Gillespie6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Vona / Jeannie Coe vs Francoise O'Donnell / Michele Simmons3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLili Chang / Marilyn Pedersen vs Char Hogan / Carla Nichols6-1, 6-2
2023-03-31vs NWW-FC-TricaricoWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Vona / Kaylee Nilan vs Sherrill Stone / Susan Tricarico6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLili Chang / Karen Stalker vs Jane Shively / Diane Erickson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Pedersen / Elizabeth Husband vs Homa Assefi / Pauline Anderson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Lili Chang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Leslie Fields
published 3
2.65
Barb Regan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Kaylee Nilan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Lynn Vona
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Elaine Loong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
Constance Essinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Penelope Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Husband
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeannie Coe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Stalker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marilyn Pedersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Priscilla Kloess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lili Chang + Elaine Loong371660% games+2.8% vs expected
Kaylee Nilan + Constance Essinger121948% games−4.3% vs expected
Kaylee Nilan + Lynn Vona5452% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Pedersen + Leslie Fields2434% gamesnot enough data
Lili Chang + Constance Essinger2350% gamesnot enough data
Karen Stalker + Lynn Vona404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Stalker + Constance Essinger314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Stalker + Elaine Loong123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lili Chang
62W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Leslie Fields
6W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Barb Regan
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Kaylee Nilan
47W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Lynn Vona
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Elaine Loong
52W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Constance Essinger
38W–60L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Penelope Lee
8W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.42
Elizabeth Husband
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeannie Coe
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Stalker
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marilyn Pedersen
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Priscilla Kloess
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.