Teams

Da.Swann40S

2023 Cap Fall Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesScott Zargo vs Steve Beck6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-09-21vs To.Blevins40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesVincent Conzola vs Chris Henrion6-4, 6-2
2023-09-14vs Br.Kaulback40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesVincent Conzola vs Jonathan Drum3-6, 2-6
2023-08-31vs To.Blevins40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesScott Zargo vs John Gouveia2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesVincent Conzola vs Todd Blevins6-2, 6-4
2023-08-17vs Mi.Elstob40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesVincent Conzola vs Mike Elstob6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesScott Zargo vs Philip Robertson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
David Swann
published 3.5
3.38
Vincent Conzola
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Greg Cox
published 3.5
3.26
Scott Zargo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
David Lee
published 3.5
3.09
ROEHL SANTOS
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Swann
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Vincent Conzola
205W–133L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Greg Cox
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Scott Zargo
60W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
David Lee
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
ROEHL SANTOS
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.