Teams

Team Hawley

2024 Yadkin Valley Racquets and Jackets · Women 3.0 - Sunday Afternoon

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-01-26vs GeorgitisLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Henderson / Allie Mangin vs Melanie Brost / Sarah Blackwell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJanine Hawley Girard / Temple Steele vs Deana Georgitis / Samantha Talbott2-6, 6-7
2025-01-25vs PleasantsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTemple Steele / Maureen Geraghty vs Virginia Pleasants / Ashley Peters2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanine Hawley Girard / Araya Puwanant vs Betsey Hutton / Whitney Newell1-6, 3-6
2025-01-08vs Coordinator TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Lehman / Allie Mangin vs Lindsey Marion / Emily Mustin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTemple Steele / Araya Puwanant vs Mary Ayscue / Amanda Crews6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-12-15vs GeorgitisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCasey Henderson / Allie Mangin vs Tammy LaValley / Melanie Brost6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAraya Puwanant / Karen Lehman vs Samantha Talbott / Sarah Blackwell0-6, 1-6
2024-11-24vs PleasantsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAraya Puwanant / Karen Lehman vs Virginia Pleasants / Kathryn Felts6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTemple Steele / Casey Henderson vs Leana Brown / Whitney Newell3-6, 2-6
2024-11-17vs Coordinator TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Henderson / Allie Mangin vs Monica Medina-Murphy / Mary Ayscue3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Geraghty / Araya Puwanant vs Hannah Hsu / Emily Mustin5-7, 3-6
2024-11-10vs Team JenningsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTemple Steele / Maureen Geraghty vs Natalie Jennings / Alice Day Clark0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 - Sunday Afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allie Mangin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Casey Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Araya Puwanant
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Janine Hawley Girard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Temple Steele
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.46
Karen Lehman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Maureen Geraghty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Geraghty + Temple Steele044 matchesnot enough data
Casey Henderson + Allie Mangin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allie Mangin
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Casey Henderson
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Araya Puwanant
14W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Janine Hawley Girard
15W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Temple Steele
1W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Karen Lehman
13W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Maureen Geraghty
9W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.