Teams

Thompson 8.0

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-04vs Tom SchneiderLost 01
L#1 DoublesCliff Bernstein / Tom Somers vs David Barnes / David Ponder4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-26vs GrabillWon 10
W#2 DoublesHoward Staley / Daniel Mandl vs Colin MacLachlan / Donald Reuwer7-5, 6-1
2022-06-30vs GrabillWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Somers / Howard Staley vs David Ledane / Ted Sholar6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-16vs Tom SchneiderSplit 11
W#2 DoublesFrancis Kreysa / Stanley Proser vs William Bloomquist / Lionel Whately6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTom Somers / Cliff Bernstein vs David Ponder / Steve McCoy6-7, 3-6
2022-06-09vs Tom SchneiderLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Somers / Howard Staley vs David Ponder / Steve McCoy2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCliff Bernstein / Francis Kreysa vs Gene Rowland / Stuart Selonick4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-07vs GrabillWon 10
W#2 DoublesCliff Bernstein / Daniel Mandl vs Vin Grabill / Ted Sholar6-3, 6-1
2022-05-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesFrancis Kreysa / Cliff Bernstein vs Clayt Lemme / Gene Rowland6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Al Zanger
published 4
Greg Kahlert
published 4
3.69
David Burnell
published 4
3.52
Al Baker
published 4
3.42
Cliff Bernstein
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Francis Kreysa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Howard Staley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Daniel Mandl
published 3.5
John Theis
published
Mark Southerland
published
Randall Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cliff Bernstein + Francis Kreysa10459% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Al Zanger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Greg Kahlert
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
David Burnell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Al Baker
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Cliff Bernstein
109W–34L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Francis Kreysa
47W–20L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Howard Staley
22W–43L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Daniel Mandl
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
John Theis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Southerland
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randall Scott
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.