← Teams

MAC-Leedy

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Michelle Doherty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.19
Marilyn von Bergen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Christian Buchholz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Barbra Jorgensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Sara Weinstein
published 3
2.76
Carol Robertson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
—
Katy Marcy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-06-28Lost 0–4
L#1 SinglesCarol Robertson vs Eileen Hart6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Marilyn von Bergen vs Sheila McCarroll / Diana Blebea6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesGretchen Wagner vs Stephanie Arnheim6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Littleton / Barbra Jorgensen vs Sandi Martes / Cheri Martes Davis6-4, 6-3
2019-06-23Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Gretchen Wagner vs Patricia Sturr / Karen Groenweghe6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDeb Garris / Katy Marcy vs Jodee Midura / Shelley Kolb6-1, 6-0
2019-06-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesShawn Cellura Radford / Katy Marcy vs Diane di Vito / Carla Wheeler6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarol Robertson vs Susan Robblee6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Michelle Doherty vs Jian Xu / Shari Levelle6-4, 6-1
2019-05-31Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Katy Marcy vs Laurence Dupray / Shannon Roarke6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Marilyn von Bergen vs Christine Moran / Ella Grant6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCarol Robertson vs Janet Cathcart6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2019-05-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Gretchen Wagner vs Colleen Kellogg / Garrene Mcgale6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMary Erzen / Marilyn von Bergen vs Dar Dragoon / Sheryl Riley6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Carlson / Barbra Jorgensen vs Claire C Gates / Lynn Wickens5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-04-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Katy Marcy vs Diane di Vito / Shari Levelle4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Gretchen Wagner vs Andrea Yao / Theresa Berry7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCarol Robertson vs Loraine Shears5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-04-27Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesCarol Robertson vs Andrea Kropp6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichelle Doherty / Catherine Leedy vs Shelley Hutley / Elizabeth Wedan6-3, 6-4
2019-04-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesShawn Cellura Radford / Katy Marcy vs Vicki Blunt / Pamela Minor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Carol Robertson vs Donna Weyand / Cheryl Geisler3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Lisa Littleton vs Tamara Phillips / Donna Baxter6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Michelle Doherty
27W–23L career
23%77%0%
3.57
3.5
Marilyn von Bergen
20W–23L career
11%88%2%
3.19
3.5
Christian Buchholz
68W–109L career
16%84%0%
3.07
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3
Barbra Jorgensen
20W–30L career
2%92%7%
2.83
3
Sara Weinstein
12W–27L career
1%98%1%
2.77
3
Carol Robertson
15W–33L career
2%96%1%
2.76
0
Katy Marcy
28W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.