Teams

SHC-Mayer(s)

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Greg Culver
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Paul Blankenmeister
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Scott Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Autumn Bunch
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Sharon Place
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
William Place
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
John Slominski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-11-30Split 11
W#1 DoublesChrys Culver / Greg Culver vs Karla Nutt / Zachary Wright6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAutumn Bunch / John Slominski vs Sarah Robertson / Jim Burns7-6, 6-2
2018-11-03Split 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Place / John Slominski vs Brie Altenau / Edward Kim6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesScott Mayer / Lisa Fogg vs Hal Bond / Christina Parks6-3, 6-4
2018-10-21Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Fogg / Scott Mayer vs Rebecca Griffith / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Place / John Slominski vs Dario Soriano / Angela Diaz de Leon6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChrys Culver / Greg Culver vs Stephanie Haas / Arturo Barroso6-1, 6-1
2018-10-21Split 11
W#1 DoublesChrys Culver / Greg Culver vs Parul Saxena / Yuehai Liang6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPamela Michie / Paul Blankenmeister vs Robin Fernstrom / Rajan Madhusudan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-10-14Won 21
W#1 DoublesChrys Culver / Greg Culver vs Kimberly Parks / Alex McIntosh6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Fogg / Scott Mayer vs Alyssa Wong / Nate Larsen6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Mayer / Paul Blankenmeister vs Secia Beier / Jered Cuenco6-4, 6-2
2018-09-29Won 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Fogg / Scott Mayer vs Brad Mathewson / Michelle Boucher7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Mayer / Paul Blankenmeister vs Brent Grubb / Kate Quisling6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Michie / William Place vs Laurel Hallock Koppelman / Scott Naugler7-6, 6-3
2018-09-22Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarri Schmidt / Scott Mayer vs Patti Dybdahl / David Duncan6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPamela Michie / John Slominski vs Carrie Willis / George Middleton6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAutumn Bunch / William Place vs Virginia Martinez / Rodrigo Martinez6-2, 6-4
2018-09-09Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Scott Mayer vs Jian Xu / Kok Waii Wong6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSharon Place / William Place vs Patty Chen / Yogesh Patel6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPamela Michie / Greg Culver vs Parul Saxena / Rajan Madhusudan1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Greg Culver
51W–25L career
not enough data
3.5
Paul Blankenmeister
33W–21L career · type S
7%92%0%
3.17
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%55%45%
3.09
3
Autumn Bunch
68W–71L career
0%92%8%
2.93
3
Sharon Place
38W–30L career
6%91%3%
2.75
3
William Place
31W–50L career
14%86%0%
2.61
0
John Slominski
16W–37L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.