Teams

Montana/Miller/65&Over7.0W

2023 65 & Over League · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-19vs Missoula 65+Split 11
W#1 DoublesDIANA RAIMONDO / Marie Neergaard vs Karen Vinton / Elizabeth Orser6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCheryl Scott / Ann Chrisler vs Kathy Nelson / Terri Ruthruff5-7, 3-6
2023-08-18vs Missoula 65+Won 21
W#1 DoublesMarie Neergaard / Nora Miller vs Karen Vinton / Elizabeth Orser6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Shaw / DIANA RAIMONDO vs Debbie Gould / Kathy Nelson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Scott / Ann Chrisler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-27vs Missoula 65+Won 30
W#1 DoublesRitva Porter / Julie Shaw vs Carla Luck / Sherry Varner7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / DIANA RAIMONDO vs Jane Selvig / Karen Spierling6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnn Chrisler / Nora Miller vs Peggy Manning / Sally Lentz6-3, 6-2
2023-07-27vs Missoula 65+Won 21
L#1 DoublesDIANA RAIMONDO / Cyndy Desin vs Sherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Chrisler / Nora Miller vs Peggy Manning / Karen Spierling6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRitva Porter / Julie Shaw vs Jane Selvig / Sally Lentz7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Cheryl Scott
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Ann Chrisler
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.24
DIANA RAIMONDO
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Julie Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Marie Neergaard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nora Miller
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Ritva Porter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DIANA RAIMONDO + Cyndy Desin4549% gamesnot enough data
Nora Miller + Cheryl Scott3447% gamesnot enough data
Nora Miller + Marie Neergaard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Scott
16W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Ann Chrisler
6W–9L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
DIANA RAIMONDO
39W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Julie Shaw
5W–9L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie Neergaard
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nora Miller
8W–14L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ritva Porter
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.