Teams

GEPTA-6.0-Adult/55+W(Sosa)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Celia Al-Tahan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Barbara Basurto
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.73
Sonia Natividad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
Carmen Cardenas
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.22
Christina Mijares
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Dina Schlotterbeck
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Lorena Sosa
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Loretta Reyes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Lourdes Olivas
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Jacobes
published
Patricia Samonte
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Shelley Danforth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Natividad + Lorena Sosa11454% games+9.2% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Patricia Jacobes12461% games+5.3% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Celia Al-Tahan273447% games+2.0% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Celia Al-Tahan21737% games−4.9% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Lorena Sosa0830% games−16.7% vs expected
Lorena Sosa + Stacy Mayo81644% gamesnot enough data
Dina Schlotterbeck + Celia Al-Tahan10658% gamesnot enough data
Dina Schlotterbeck + Loretta Reyes10359% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Celia Al-Tahan
114W–159L career · 45 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Barbara Basurto
23W–31L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sonia Natividad
39W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Carmen Cardenas
32W–115L career · type A · 27 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.39
2.5
Christina Mijares
11W–25L career · 10 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Dina Schlotterbeck
60W–82L career · 26 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorena Sosa
63W–114L career · 28 lines in 2024
not enough data
Loretta Reyes
16W–8L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lourdes Olivas
93W–117L career · 35 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–68L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Jacobes
52W–53L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Samonte
30W–65L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelley Danforth
21W–34L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–94L career · 30 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.