Teams

Smart Aces

2022 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Asel / Maria Elena Greene vs Denise Jack / Ji Park3-6, 1-6
2022-05-05vs Friends of CourtWon 20
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Alexandra Hall Hall vs Julie Borror / Kate Wesley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Melanie Way vs Paige Bartlett / Diana Shevlin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-28vs Spring ChicksSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRobin Birchfield / Errin Matechak vs Blair Reid / Teresa Plott6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Elena Greene / Alixandria Lapp vs Carole Walter / Melissa Laskin4-6, 3-5
2022-04-21vs SORRY! Not sorry!Split 11
L#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Ali Riley vs Jeanne Baily / Jennifer Gick5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEdie Ashton / Maria Elena Greene vs Jessica Egenrieder / Mary Krueger6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-19vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Robin Birchfield vs Jill Poretz / Jennifer East6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
3.96
Kenna Brown
published
3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Edie Ashton
published 4
3.41
Robin Birchfield
published
3.40
Maria Elena Greene
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Alixandria Lapp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Mary Asel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Elena Greene + Alixandria Lapp341855% games+5.0% vs expected
Errin Matechak + Alexandra Hall Hall314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexandra Hall Hall
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
Kenna Brown
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Edie Ashton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Birchfield
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Maria Elena Greene
67W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Alixandria Lapp
63W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mary Asel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.