Teams

Montana/Witt/55&Over8.0M

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Men 8.0 - 55 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-17vs VraalagLost 12
W#1 DoublesFrank Witt / Paul Beck vs Thomas Shea / Dennis Vap6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Turley / Jon Catton vs Enrique Osorio / Ernesto Alfaro6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Saville / Chuck Smith vs Scott Hanson / James Shaffer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-17vs Old, Slow & UglyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJon Catton / Raymond Armstrong vs Kelly Crisp / Craig Holtet4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Saville / Chuck Smith vs Kim Delman / Philip McMurray1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFrank Witt / Paul Beck vs Jamie Armstrong / Bill Wilcox6-1, 6-2
2022-06-16vs VraalagWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Beck / Frank Witt vs Jimmy Vroman / Dennis Vap6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJon Catton / Michael Turley vs Thomas Shea / James Shaffer7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Chuck Smith vs Enrique Osorio / Ernesto Alfaro0-6, 0-6
2022-06-16vs Old, Slow & UglyWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrank Witt / Paul Beck vs Jamie Armstrong / Craig Holtet6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Turley / Jon Catton vs David Herrera / Bill Wilcox7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Saville / Raymond Armstrong vs Kelly Crisp / Kim Delman6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 8.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Witt/55&Over8.0M31841197
2Vraalag31751299
3Old, Slow & Ugly043920124

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Paul Beck
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Chuck Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Frank Witt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jon Catton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Turley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Raymond Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Saville
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Witt + Paul Beck404 matchesnot enough data
Jon Catton + Michael Turley213 matchesnot enough data
Steve Saville + Paul Beck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Paul Beck
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Chuck Smith
5W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Frank Witt
13W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jon Catton
17W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Turley
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Raymond Armstrong
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Saville
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.