Teams

Ly.DeVance55A

2026 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-04vs Ju.Stewart55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Jones / Ann Freeman vs Laura Hiller / Marti Crane5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLynise Devance / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Kristal Nelson / Jane Williams6-3, 6-3
2026-04-25vs Er.McAllister55AWon 21
W#1 DoublesJackie Bowers / Cynthia Jones vs Valerie Szwarc / Janet Sprague6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynise Devance / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Helen Cuccaro / Susan Paeplow6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Allen / Kathryn Pollak vs Erin McAllister / Sheila Riley6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-18vs An.Hungate55AWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnn Freeman / Angela Allen vs Jennifer Kuzma / Adrienne Todd5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJackie Bowers / Cynthia Jones vs Deb Lanier / Joanne Kearney7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynise Devance / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Ellen Libby / Laura Davidson6-2, 6-3
2026-04-11vs Ju.Stewart55AWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Graybeal / Sharon Campbell vs Amy Clarke / Jane Williams3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Allen / Ann Freeman vs Laura Hiller / Diane Patton6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynise Devance / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Adrianne Leinbach / Susan Fekete6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Er.McAllister55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesIna Jones / Sherry Smith vs Sandra Rhoades / Valerie Szwarc6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Campbell / Lisa Graybeal vs Janet Sprague / Jennifer Wray6-2, 7-5
2026-03-21vs An.Hungate55ALost 12
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Lisa Graybeal vs Kathryn Stone / Button Hall4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Cynthia Jones vs Kimberly Hilt / Gillian Kelleher5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngela Allen / Sharon Campbell vs Laura Davidson / Beate Steffen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-14vs Ju.Stewart55ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesLynise Devance / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Amy Clarke / Susan Fekete6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Allen / Sharon Campbell vs Judith Stewart / Jane Williams3-6, 6-7
2026-03-07vs Er.McAllister55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Allen / Ann Freeman vs Lisa Scott / Valerie Szwarc6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSherry Smith / Ina Jones vs Erin McAllister / Zana Piric7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Jackie Bowers vs Amy Wolfe / Susan Paeplow6-3, 7-5
2026-02-28vs An.Hungate55AWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Angela Allen vs Kathryn Stone / Jennifer Kuzma7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathryn Pollak / Cynthia Jones vs Laura Davidson / Brenda Li0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Freeman / Lisa Graybeal vs Jennifer Hensley / Beate Steffen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1An.Kinlaw55A7120413162
2Ly.DeVance55A72171026235
3Is.Gesher55A6218618179
4Ju.Stewart55A63171025248
5Jo.Lake55A5315923205
6Ka.McKee55A53131124194
7Er.McAllister55A36111637283
8St.Rabby55A2661838254
9Su.Greer55A2661839267
10An.Hungate55A2791838258
11Ro.Sealey55A1761837256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jackie Bowers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Lynise Devance
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Cynthia Jones
published 4
3.73
Ina Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Ann Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Sheryletta Lacewell
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.47
Kathryn Pollak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Cynthia Walters
published 3.5
3.33
Sharon Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Lisa Graybeal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Walters + Jackie Bowers15560% games+7.2% vs expected
Lynise Devance + Sheryletta Lacewell5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Bowers
90W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Lynise Devance
126W–71L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cynthia Jones
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ina Jones
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ann Freeman
3W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Sheryletta Lacewell
14W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
Kathryn Pollak
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cynthia Walters
63W–69L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Sharon Campbell
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Lisa Graybeal
46W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.