Teams

WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT Kosobucki

2025 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.42 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-15vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT DundasWon 21
W#1 SinglesJacob Rodgers vs Sasha Chackalackal6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesIan Pray / Brian Kosobucki vs Matthew Bauman / William Herzog6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJustin Yee vs Noah Wankerl0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-08vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT BowerWon 21
L#1 SinglesJustin Yee vs Brendan Pietila - *1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJacob Rodgers vs Henry Johnson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Kosobucki / Ian Pray vs Jeffrey Bradfield / Gregory Cox6-2, 6-1
2025-07-01vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT AkyuzSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJacob Rodgers vs Enes Akyuz6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Kosobucki / Ian Pray vs Peter Christ / Michael McPhee3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-17vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT DundasWon 21
W#1 SinglesJacob Rodgers vs Sasha Chackalackal6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIan Pray / Brian Kosobucki vs William Herzog / Alexander Carlos7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJustin Yee vs Sujay K Shankar6-2, 6-4
2025-06-10vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT BoregowdaWon 41
W#1 DoublesJohn Braxler / Owen Grafe vs Murphy Schaff / John Rice6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacob Rodgers vs Daichi Hikimoto6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTimothy Daley / Ian Pray vs Krishna Boregowda / Seongho Choi6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJustin Yee vs Jun Hyung Chang6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDerek Hubbard / Bob Whiteis vs Eric Han / Nathan Wood3-6, 4-6
2025-06-03vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT SchureWon 30
W#1 SinglesJacob Rodgers vs Jordan Raemisch6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIan Pray / Seth Taapken vs Jeff Schure / THIBAUT DEHAY7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJustin Yee vs Grant Stafford6-3, 6-2
2025-05-27vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT EncellWon 20
W#1 SinglesJustin Yee vs Lee Taylor6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Kosobucki / Ian Pray vs Neil Kodesh / Brayden Parman6-0, 6-4
2025-05-20vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5M MALT BowerLost 12
L#1 SinglesJacob Rodgers vs Brendan Pietila - *0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Kosobucki / Ian Pray vs Jim Bower / Jeffrey Bradfield6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJustin Yee vs Henry Johnson5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Jacob Rodgers
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #1 Doubles 15% · published
4.47
Justin Yee
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
4.40
Carter Braxton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.39
Ian Pray
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published 4.5
4.38
Ricardo Martins
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.28
Jeremy Heidel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.28
Owen Grafe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.27
Brian Kosobucki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.26
Carlos Marquez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
John Braxler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Timothy Daley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Seth Taapken
published
3.90
Derek Hubbard
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.82
Bob Whiteis
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Patrick Carney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Heidel + Brian Kosobucki6160% games+9.1% vs expected
Seth Taapken + Carlos Marquez6164% games+8.0% vs expected
Ian Pray + Brian Kosobucki181756% games+1.8% vs expected
Ricardo Martins + Ian Pray4155% games+1.1% vs expected
Owen Grafe + Carlos Marquez4357% games+1.1% vs expected
Timothy Daley + Brian Kosobucki4256% games−3.3% vs expected
Seth Taapken + Timothy Daley5258% games−3.7% vs expected
Jeremy Heidel + Carlos Marquez5349% games−7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Rodgers
64W–22L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.52
Justin Yee
100W–50L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Carter Braxton
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Ian Pray
70W–43L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Ricardo Martins
47W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
Jeremy Heidel
51W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Owen Grafe
46W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Brian Kosobucki
169W–82L career · 15 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Carlos Marquez
89W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
John Braxler
41W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Timothy Daley
53W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Seth Taapken
51W–26L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Derek Hubbard
64W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Bob Whiteis
57W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Patrick Carney
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.