Teams

Jessica Bodine-YTC-18+-4.0

2025 Auburn USTA Adult 18 & Over Fall League · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-18vs Jennifer Ragsdale-YTC-18+-4.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesJessica Bodine / Andi Lee vs Whitney Davis / Amanda Pack6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Gerst vs Mary Ashlyn Pearce6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Hulon / Munkyung Kim vs Misun Cho / Jeeyoung Kim6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGinelle Weissinger / Melinda Weissinger vs Jennifer Ragsdale / Berkeley Ragsdale3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-11vs Jennifer Ragsdale-YTC-18+-4.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesDawson Fite / Cameran Williams vs Whitney Davis / Kristin Adams6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMunkyung Kim vs Mary Ashlyn Pearce6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Weyant / Kim Riley vs Amanda Pack / Berkeley Ragsdale6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGinelle Weissinger / Melinda Weissinger vs Jeeyoung Kim / Misun Cho5-7, 3-6
2024-11-04vs Jennifer Ragsdale-YTC-18+-4.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesLily Truchet / Tomoko Maeda vs Jeeyoung Kim / Misun Cho6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDawson Fite vs Leesa Marie Harris6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndi Lee / Munkyung Kim vs Mary Ashlyn Pearce / Hallie Rogers5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Bodine / Jo Frinak vs Kristin Adams / Whitney Davis6-3, 6-1
2024-10-28vs Jennifer Ragsdale-YTC-18+-4.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesAndi Lee / Munkyung Kim vs Jeeyoung Kim / Misun Cho6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLily Truchet vs Leesa Marie Harris4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Hulon / Cameran Williams vs Whitney Davis / Mary Ashlyn Pearce6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelinda Weissinger / Robin Weyant vs Berkeley Ragsdale / Jennifer Ragsdale6-1, 6-1
2024-10-21vs Jennifer Ragsdale-YTC-18+-4.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesDawson Fite / Lily Truchet vs Jennifer Ragsdale / Berkeley Ragsdale6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKatie Gerst vs Leesa Marie Harris6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGinelle Weissinger / Jo Frinak vs Amanda Pack / Jeeyoung Kim6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Riley / Tomoko Maeda vs Whitney Davis / Mary Ashlyn Pearce6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Dawson Fite
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.73
Andi Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.59
Katie Gerst
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.54
Lily Truchet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.52
Cameran Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Jessica Bodine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Jo Frinak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Munkyung Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Melinda Weissinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Tomoko Maeda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Robin Weyant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Heidi Hulon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Ginelle Weissinger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andi Lee + Tomoko Maeda5170% games+23.9% vs expected
Ginelle Weissinger + Robin Weyant4352% games+17.0% vs expected
Andi Lee + Munkyung Kim14857% games+4.5% vs expected
Andi Lee + Jessica Bodine8061% games+3.3% vs expected
Melinda Weissinger + Robin Weyant21136% games+1.4% vs expected
Andi Lee + Jo Frinak5065% games+0.6% vs expected
Ginelle Weissinger + Melinda Weissinger134 matchesnot enough data
Katie Gerst + Cameran Williams303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dawson Fite
45W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
4.5
Andi Lee
64W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.73
Katie Gerst
33W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Lily Truchet
16W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
4
Cameran Williams
24W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
Jessica Bodine
21W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jo Frinak
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Munkyung Kim
66W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Melinda Weissinger
5W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Tomoko Maeda
32W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.18
Robin Weyant
17W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Heidi Hulon
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Ginelle Weissinger
20W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.