Teams

Brandkamp 3.0 18+

2022 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-16vs LeagueLost 01
L#3 DoublesMeredith Hampton / Heather Senter vs Heather Weddle / Cory Noonan2-6, 3-6
2022-05-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Senter / Tracy Pierson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-30vs King/Reeves 3.0 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Helen Bell vs Sheila Finnicum / Mary Smith6-0, 6-2
2022-04-23vs WescottLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Lisa Brandkamp vs Courtney Mullins / Taylor Waddle2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-20vs ODEN CFCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Senter / Stacie Williams vs Alexandra Krallman / Sarah Schaeffer6-3, 6-0
2022-04-13vs LeagueWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Crumpton / Heather Senter vs Cory Noonan / Jacqui Donovan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-04vs Gansmann Vest HTRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Kelly Capobianco vs Shannon Russell / Tracie West6-3, 7-5
2022-03-07vs WescottLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Brandkamp / Heather Senter vs Brittany Savoca / Jennifer Wescott5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Heather Senter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.36
Lisa Brandkamp
published
3.35
Kelly Capobianco
published
3.33
Mollie McKay
published
3.28
Stacie Williams
published
3.26
Autumn Correnti
published 3.5
3.03
Windy Pigford
published
2.94
Tracy Pierson
published
2.87
Andrea Crumpton
published 3
2.81
2.75
Meredith Hampton
published
2.65
Alexis Wall
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Pierson + Stacie Williams2545% games+1.0% vs expected
Erin Sullivan Helie + Autumn Correnti123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Senter
245W–167L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Lisa Brandkamp
30W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Kelly Capobianco
25W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Mollie McKay
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Stacie Williams
40W–44L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Autumn Correnti
14W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Windy Pigford
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Tracy Pierson
41W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Andrea Crumpton
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Erin Sullivan Helie
17W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Meredith Hampton
13W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Alexis Wall
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.