Teams

ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Rock Quarry Tennis Courts
Oct 5 8:00 PM
Durham Academy Upper School
2026-09-07vs DHertzog-HVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Baxley / Rita Burgess vs Nancy Pike / Elizabeth Everett6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelli Harris / Lisa Mason vs Elizabeth Yancy / Ruth Caccavale6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYuko Resseguie / Shirley Chapman vs Barbara Wilhelm / Susan Peak6-0, 6-2
2026-08-24vs DLiller.C-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Misa / Sandy Willey vs Dori Liller / Donna Spero6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRita Burgess / Angela Baxley vs Sheza Healey / Sally Mauriello4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeanne Murray / Meta Kuehn vs Mary Macdonald / Millie Hunter6-7, 2-6
2026-08-17vs DHertzog-HVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Misa / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Cecily Peterson / Elizabeth Yancy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Baxley / Rita Burgess vs Barbara Wilhelm / Deborah Hertzog4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYuko Resseguie / Kathy Holt vs Elizabeth Everett / Stephanie Perun5-7, 2-6
2026-08-03vs DLiller.C-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesShirley Chapman / Donna Misa vs Altagracia Evert / Millicent Snow3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Baxley / Rita Burgess vs Laura Webb-Murrah / Jennifer Hoffmann6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Mason / Zana Piric vs Tracy Stefan / Donna Spero4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DLiller.C-HS1133649
2ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR0112427

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Yuko Resseguie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Zana Piric
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelli Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Angela Baxley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Donna Misa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Jeanne Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Sandy Willey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Rita Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Lisa Mason
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Shirley Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Kathy Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Baxley + Rita Burgess10162% games+12.5% vs expected
Lisa Mason + Kelli Harris6066% gamesnot enough data
Donna Misa + Yuko Resseguie123 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Lee Berrios-Smothers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Yuko Resseguie
130W–138L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Kelli Harris
40W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Angela Baxley
291W–180L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Donna Misa
47W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%55%<1%
3.02
Jeanne Murray
13W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Sandy Willey
25W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–108L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Rita Burgess
20W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Lisa Mason
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Shirley Chapman
139W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Kathy Holt
25W–63L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.