Teams

GEPTA/Burns/55&overMX/7.0

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.16
Elizabeth Wakefield
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
2.84
Diane Lunghi
usually #2 Doubles 51%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published 3
EDMUND OSEI-WUSU
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Grace Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
James Lambeth
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Jorge Kareh
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Kevin Woodson
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
MIN KIM
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Michael Bezemek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Robert Burns
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Rosanna Missirian
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Selena Solis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Steven Haynes
usually #1 Doubles 49%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Haynes + Michael Bezemek4848% games−1.5% vs expected
MIN KIM + EDMUND OSEI-WUSU3543% games−16.0% vs expected
Grace Gomez + James Lambeth4448% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Diane Lunghi4352% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Jorge Kareh5259% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Patricia Dalbin2446% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Kevin Woodson3353% gamesnot enough data
EDMUND OSEI-WUSU + Robert Burns4251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathey Jo Alberson
48W–26L career · 27 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Elizabeth Wakefield
37W–14L career · 17 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Diane Lunghi
141W–95L career · 39 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
EDMUND OSEI-WUSU
48W–85L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gerla Gallardo
96W–62L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Grace Gomez
145W–85L career · 27 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Lambeth
106W–98L career · 67 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jorge Kareh
67W–100L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
76W–65L career · 52 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Woodson
84W–67L career · 44 lines in 2024
not enough data
MIN KIM
102W–80L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Bezemek
96W–84L career · 38 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 34 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Burns
41W–43L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosanna Missirian
111W–86L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Haynes
79W–57L career · 37 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.