Teams

Base Line Babes

SINGLES 18 & OVER · 2.5 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-17vs Diane's - All the single ladiesLost 02
L#2 SinglesNicole Swick vs Liv Cook1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesVeronica Shearin vs Kristi Payne3-6, 4-6
2025-08-16vs Single Mingle KDHLost 03
L#1 SinglesSarah Wongmanee vs Hillary Nystrom6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSam Wills vs JoAnne Willis4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesVeronica Shearin vs Katelin Kight1-6, 2-6
2025-08-12vs Diane's - All the single ladiesLost 01
L#3 SinglesVeronica Shearin vs Liv Cook2-6, 2-6
2025-08-03vs Single Mingle KDHWon 10
W#3 SinglesSarah Wongmanee vs Olga Perry6-0, 6-3
2025-07-30vs Single Mingle KDHLost 02
L#1 SinglesSarah Wongmanee vs Raquel Morrison0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesSam Wills vs Hannah Comer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-07-27vs Diane's - All the single ladiesLost 02
L#2 SinglesSarah Wongmanee vs Morgan Edwards6-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesNicole Swick vs Liv Cook1-6, 2-6
2025-07-19vs Diane's - All the single ladiesLost 02
L#2 SinglesSallie Kerr vs Diane Klementowich1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesVeronica Shearin vs Kristi Payne4-6, 4-6
2025-07-13vs Single Mingle KDHSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSam Wills vs JoAnne Willis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesNicole Swick vs Jennifer Quinn6-1, 6-3
2025-07-09vs Single Mingle KDHWon 10
W#2 SinglesSarah Wongmanee vs Olga Perry6-0, 6-0
2025-07-06vs Diane's - All the single ladiesLost 02
L#2 SinglesSarah Wongmanee vs Porsche Polise-Zygler0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesNicole Swick vs Morgan Edwards1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.47
Sarah Wongmanee
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.33
Sallie Kerr
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.33
Sam Wills
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.04
Veronica Shearin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
1.92
Nicole Swick
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Mary Toohey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Shearin + Mary Toohey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Wongmanee
26W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Sallie Kerr
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.33
Sam Wills
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.33
Veronica Shearin
4W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Nicole Swick
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Mary Toohey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.